Re: sparcv9a-mont SIGBUS

2010-07-01 Thread Andy Polyakov
>> SIGBUS normally denotes unaligned access, but instruction in qustion >> pulls 16-bit value and effective address is 16-bit aligned... >>> I just tried a test .S file with >>> >>> ldda[%sp+0+16]%asi, %f0 >>> ldda[%sp+0+8]%asi, %f0 >>> ldda[%sp+0+4]%asi, %f0 >>>

Re: sparcv9a-mont SIGBUS

2010-07-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Thursday 2010-07-01 11:31, Andy Polyakov wrote: > SIGBUS normally denotes unaligned access, but instruction in qustion > pulls 16-bit value and effective address is 16-bit aligned... >> >> I just tried a test .S file with >> >> ldda[%sp+0+16]%asi, %f0 >> ldda[%sp+0+8

Re: SRP support (RFC 5054) in OpenSSL

2010-07-01 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010, Rahul Srinivas wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any plans to include SRP support (RFC 5054) in OpenSSL ? I saw > that a patch was available at > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1794 . > It is likely to be included at some point. That is a complex contribution which

Re: sparcv9a-mont SIGBUS

2010-07-01 Thread Andy Polyakov
SIGBUS normally denotes unaligned access, but instruction in qustion pulls 16-bit value and effective address is 16-bit aligned... > > I just tried a test .S file with > > ldda[%sp+0+16]%asi, %f0 > ldda[%sp+0+8]%asi, %f0 > ldda[%sp+0+4]%asi, %f0 > ldd

Re: sparcv9a-mont SIGBUS

2010-07-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Thursday 2010-07-01 10:09, Andy Polyakov wrote: >>> SIGBUS normally denotes unaligned access, but instruction in qustion >>> pulls 16-bit value and effective address is 16-bit aligned... I just tried a test .S file with ldda[%sp+0+16]%asi, %f0 ldda[%sp+0+8]%asi, %f0

SRP support (RFC 5054) in OpenSSL

2010-07-01 Thread Rahul Srinivas
Hi, Are there any plans to include SRP support (RFC 5054) in OpenSSL ? I saw that a patch was available at http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1794 . Thanks, -Rahul __ OpenSSL Project htt

Re: sparcv9a-mont SIGBUS

2010-07-01 Thread Andy Polyakov
>>> Since the inclusion of sparcv9a-mont.s/.pl, I get a SIGBUS error when >>> running bntest. Package is openssl 1.0.0 with sparcv9a on Linux 2.6.34 >>> with a sparcv9 environment (64-bit kernel, 32-bit userspace/v8/v8plus) >>> on a sun4v US T1 CPU. I am aware of the FPU implications - openssl ju

Re: sparcv9a-mont SIGBUS

2010-07-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Wednesday 2010-06-30 16:04, Andy Polyakov wrote: >> Since the inclusion of sparcv9a-mont.s/.pl, I get a SIGBUS error when >> running bntest. Package is openssl 1.0.0 with sparcv9a on Linux 2.6.34 >> with a sparcv9 environment (64-bit kernel, 32-bit userspace/v8/v8plus) >> on a sun4v US T1 CPU