Re: [PATCH/cygwin] iutil/cygwin.sh: Add versioned runtime package

2010-08-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 24 23:47, Andy Polyakov wrote: Hi, would somebody with checkin permissions be so kind to check in the following Cygwin-specific patch? The patch was really overdue. It changes the layout of the Cygwin OpenSSL distribution packages so that the runtime is separated out into

RE: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

2010-08-25 Thread Kees Dekker via RT
Hi, Why does Solaris 10 on SparcIII not suffer from this problem, is unclear to me. We always use -lmalloc for our application, and have only one solaris 10 build (used on all Solaris systems, regardless the processor type). Unfortunatelly, (our) support for Solaris is system limited, and

RE: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

2010-08-25 Thread Kees Dekker
Hi, -Original Message- From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: Saturday, 21 August, 2010 14:42 To: Kees Dekker Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450

RE: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

2010-08-25 Thread Kees Dekker
-Original Message- From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: Monday, 23 August, 2010 17:23 To: Kees Dekker Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

RE: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

2010-08-25 Thread Kees Dekker
Addition: building the openssl application with -lmalloc results in the same coredump May be dlopen(libdevinfo.so.1) and using -lmalloc does not work together (at least on UltraSparcII). Kees -Original Message- From: Kees Dekker Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2010 14:25 To:

RE: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

2010-08-25 Thread Kees Dekker
Hi, Why does Solaris 10 on SparcIII not suffer from this problem, is unclear to me. We always use -lmalloc for our application, and have only one solaris 10 build (used on all Solaris systems, regardless the processor type). Unfortunatelly, (our) support for Solaris is system limited, and we

[openssl.org #2325] memory corruption after libssl is unloaded from memory

2010-08-25 Thread Jan Pechanec via RT
hi, this has been shortly discussed on the OpenSSL dev list (sent on Aug 10, 2010). I understand that given the conditions needed to reproduce this error it will not be a priority but we believe it is a bug worth fixing so we would like to document it in the OpenSSL RT. Thank you.

Re: [openssl.org #2321] bug report: core dump on OPENSSL_cpuid_setup() on Solaris 10 with a Sun Enterprise 450 system

2010-08-25 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
Why does Solaris 10 on SparcIII not suffer from this problem, is unclear to me. Because there is a shortcut. VIS2-capable CPUs are excused from libdevinfo voodoo and USIII is VIS2-capable CPU. Because all so-far observed VIS2-capable CPUs has identical qualities from OpenSSL viewpoint. VIS2