Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > sms>I'm subscribed to the list, so the extra copy isn't needed. > > Plus the extra copy bounces... Hmmm. I was getting two. Anyway, ... > However, there's a point here. When /NOPOINTER_SIZE is used ("" was > specified for size), are the pointers long or short

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <11031907290331_20200...@antinode.info> on Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:29:03 -0500 (CDT), "Steven M. Schweda" said: sms> From: Richard Levitte sms> To:openssl-dev@openssl.org, sms@antinode-info sms> sms>R: sms> sms>I'm subscribed to the list, so the extra copy isn't needed.

[openssl.org #2463] [PATCH]: OpenSSL 1.0.0d: Add abbility to load server certificate by ENGINE.

2011-03-19 Thread Andrey Kulikov via RT
>I prefer more generic method similar to ENGINE_load_ssl_client_cert, i.e. I need EVP keys, > corresponding certificates and the certificate chain. Additional methods has "server" in it's names for the same reason why "ENGINE_load_ssl_client_cert" has "client" in it. ENGINE_load_server_certificat

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> Also, it seems that /POINTER_SIZE=64=ARGV isn't supported with HP C > 7.1. [...] I can believe that. SYS$HELP:CC073.RELEASE_NOTES puts it under "5.2 Enhancements in V7.1", but SYS$HELP:CC071.RELEASE_NOTES doesn't mention it. Trust no one, I always say. >That's depressing. My first im

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte To: openssl-dev@openssl.org, sms@antinode-info R: I'm subscribed to the list, so the extra copy isn't needed. > about your latest changes, it seems that it has SSL_LIBCRYPTO32.OLB > and SSL_LIBSSL32.OLB as default names (when have specified "" for the > bits para

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Richard Levitte
Hey, about your latest changes, it seems that it has SSL_LIBCRYPTO32.OLB and SSL_LIBSSL32.OLB as default names (when have specified "" for the bits parameter)... is that your intention? I find it a bit confusing, I'd rather expect something like this: bits="" => SSL_LIBCRYPTO.OLB, SSL_LIBSSL.OL

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <11031820281928_20200...@antinode.info> on Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:28:19 -0500 (CDT), "Steven M. Schweda" said: sms>More VMS builder mysteries... sms> sms>In "makevms.com", I see: sms> sms> $! P6, if defined, sets a compiler thread NOT needed on OpenVMS 7.1 (and up). sms> sms>