On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 09:02, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:28 AM, via RT wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve tested DTLS implementation and know that several fixes has
>>> been applied for issues related to fragment.
>>
>> Thanks for t
On 01/04/2011 09:02, Robin Seggelmann via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:28 AM, via RT wrote:
>
>> I’ve tested DTLS implementation and know that several fixes has
>> been applied for issues related to fragment.
>
> Thanks for testing! There is a known issue with the bitmask, the
> patc
We have discovered that the heap walking in RAND_poll function is a
cause of deadlock in one of our processes.
OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64)
OpenSLL: 0.9.8o
This issue could be related to the performance issue reported in:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2100&user=guest&p
Hi,
On Apr 1, 2011, at 9:28 AM, via RT wrote:
> I’ve tested DTLS implementation and know that several fixes has been
> applied for issues related to fragment.
Thanks for testing! There is a known issue with the bitmask, the patch #2457
addresses that, but has not been applied to the official so
Hi,
I’ve tested DTLS implementation and know that several fixes has been
applied for issues related to fragment.
But, it still has a problem to reassemble fragments. Please, check the
attached patch.
Regards,
BS Gwak
Hi, I??ve tested DTLS implementation and know that several fixes ha
Hi,
I’ve tested DTLS implementation and know that several fixes has been
applied for issues related to fragment.
But, it still has a problem to reassemble fragments. Please, check the
attached patch.
Regards,
BS Gwak
dtls_fragment.diff
Description: Binary data