Small addendum:
OID value 4294967295 (2^32-1) encodes correctly,
The values 4294967296 (2^32)until 4294967299 (2^32+3)encode into 0 until 3.
The value 4294967300 (2^32 + 4) encodes correctly again!
(Probably here the program turns too late into the arbitrary-number mode?)
Regards
Daniel Marsch
Hello,
I have a bug report for OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010 (latest stable for
Debian Squeeze)
OpenSSL has problems encoding OIDs which are at the border of 32 bit range.
I tested encoding several OIDs in the "new_oids" section to generate
attributes.
- OpenSSL encodes the OID 2.999.4294967295
Hi there,
I met the following undefined symbol when building. I have moved two
dependent functions from aes_misc.c to aes_core.c for a temporary work
around.
Additionally, would you know if there is a schedule for OpenSSL to support
TLS 1.1 in 1.0.1 release?
Many thanks,
Volan
OpenSSL self
Hi,
I am using DTLS in non-blocking mode using select.
There are two parts :
PART I: DURING HANDSHAKE :
As recommended I use DTLSv1_get_timeout and DTLS_handle_timeout when I get
WANT_READ/WANT_WRITE from all the four calls (SSL_connect, accept, read and
write).
I treat WANT_READ/WANT_W
Ping 2?
Corinna
On May 16 15:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Mar 17 12:44, Corinna Vinschen via RT wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > would you mind to apply the below patch to util/cygwin.sh in the 0.9.8
> > branch, too? It has been applied only to HEAD, accidentally.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
>
Ping 2?
It's 3 months since I asked to apply this simple patch. Is something
wrong with the patch, apart from removing the call to ERR_remove_state
entirely, as discussed in
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg29218.html ?
Corinna
On May 16 15:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
