Re: [openssl.org #2675] 1.0.1-beta1 issue: X509 certificate serial numbers are displayed as negative

2012-01-11 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> This was already requested in #2049 > /Ann. > *** > issue: > X509 certificate serial numbers are displayed as negative, > e.g. in > -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- > MIIB2zCCAUSgAwIBAgIFAKoSExQwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwNTEzMDEGA1UEAxMq > TmVnU2VyaWFsIFBLSSBS

Re: Bug in 1.0.0f x86_64cpuid.pl

2012-01-11 Thread Andy Polyakov
> I've noticed a bug regarding white spaces within the directory name of Perl > binary ($^X) in crypto/x86_64cpuid.pl. > IIRC this does affect older versions of the 1.0 branch too. > > Build fails with the following message: > set ASM=nasm -f win64 -DNEAR -Ox -g > perl crypto\x86

Re: [openssl.org #2685] [PATCH] sparc-v9 aes perl script breaks 1.0.0f (maybe earlier?) and snapshot on (ultra) solaris 5.7

2012-01-11 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
>> It must be "perl" thing, rather than "Solaris". This is strange, because >> I test with rather old perl version, 5.003 and it's not a problem. >> What's your 'perl -v'? But most interesting question why just >> aes-sparcv9.pl? Other assembler scripts also have similar expression, >> without '' a

Re: [openssl.org #2685] [PATCH] sparc-v9 aes perl script breaks 1.0.0f (maybe earlier?) and snapshot on (ultra) solaris 5.7

2012-01-11 Thread Geoff Winkless via RT
On 10 January 2012 20:02, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: > It must be "perl" thing, rather than "Solaris". This is strange, because > I test with rather old perl version, 5.003 and it's not a problem. > What's your 'perl -v'? But most interesting question why just > aes-sparcv9.pl? Other assembler sc

[openssl.org #2100] RAND_poll can be incredibly slow on Windows7 due to Heap32Next

2012-01-11 Thread Andre Heinecke via RT
The workaround for this issue is hat was added for 0.9.8m is only applied in an #ifdef _MSC_VER codebranch. This bug is also triggered when building openssl in mingw so it should be applied for this, too. It might account for reports that users are still running into this problem with recent ver

Bug in 1.0.0f x86_64cpuid.pl

2012-01-11 Thread Arvid Winkelsdorf
Hello, I've noticed a bug regarding white spaces within the directory name of Perl binary ($^X) in crypto/x86_64cpuid.pl. IIRC this does affect older versions of the 1.0 branch too. Build fails with the following message: set ASM=nasm -f win64 -DNEAR -Ox -g perl crypto\x86_64cpu