RE: [openssl.org #2789] SHA-256 bug - Big endian arch

2012-04-12 Thread Green, Paul
Pavel Stanek wrote:   > I think that there is a bug in [OpenSSL 0.9.8 ] SHA-256 implementation [ when > on a big-endian x86 ] > Platform is Renesas SH3E in BIG-endian mode ( used compiler sh3eb-linux-gcc) > > OpenSSL version:  0.9.8u > Options:  -DB_ENDIAN > Target:   linux-generi

[openssl.org #2789] SHA-256 bug - Big endian arch

2012-04-12 Thread Pavel Stanek via RT
  Hi all,   I think that there is a bug in SHA-256 implementation.   I have tried to compile least Openssl of 0.9.8 branch  - 0.9.8u but make test failed on SHA-256 test.   ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./shatest test 1 ok test 2 ok test 3 ok ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./sha1test test 1 ok test 2 ok test 3 ok .

[openssl.org #2788] Problems with OpenSSL "no-tlsext" option

2012-04-12 Thread Tomas Svensson via RT
Hi, The "no-tlsext" option (resulting in OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT beeing set) has some problems: 1) If OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT is set, the parsing code for TLS extensions is not beeing compiled in, but we still always send the SCSV cipher suite indicating that we support secure renegotiation according to R

compilation error while building openssl 1.0.1 on windows

2012-04-12 Thread sajualways
openssl 1.0.1 and win32: assembler error: x86cpuid.asm Building OpenSSL perl util/copy.pl ".\crypto\buildinf.h" "tmp32dll\buildinf.h" Copying: ./crypto/buildinf.h to tmp32dll/buildinf.h ml /nologo /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Zi /Fotmp32dll\x86cpuid.obj tmp32dll\x86cp id.asm Assembling: t