I have seen Dr. Stephen's reply in this thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg63620.html, that
fipsld can be modified as long as it follows rules in the security policy.
On 11/26/12 4:30 PM, "Santhosh Kokala"
wrote:
>Thanks Dr. Stephen and Andy for helping me resolve th
Thanks Dr. Stephen and Andy for helping me resolve this issue. I modified
fipsld script to use gcc for compiling fips_premain.c and it worked.
On 11/25/12 1:42 PM, "Andy Polyakov" wrote:
>Santhosh Kokala wrote:
>> I would really appreciate, if someone helps me with this issue.
>
>Why not just th
The attached patch adds a "WEB" entry to the cipher list selection. The
idea is that applications can just use that and get a reasonable set of
cipher suites, offering a trade-off between security and
interoperability. These cipher suites are all certificate-based, so
that applications send a
Hi guys,
I'm trying to find the source of a deadlock issue concerning apache
(2.2.22 with APR-1.4.6) and openssl-1.0.0j. From what I can see I have
the exact same situation as in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53870 but the patch
referenced there (http://cvs.openssl.org/ch
I have hundred of files that have been signed (using BEID) and verified
successfully.
Nevertheless, I have 1 file that failed on verification (only one) and I do
not know why.
I even tried to verify it using public tools like 'cryptonit' or 'openssl'
But it failed with the following message
open
The latest tarball for head failed to compile for DJGPP because an
include file from the WATT32 distribution (tcp.h), required in the DJGPP
build, defines "byte" as "unsigned char". This patch renames "byte" to
"byte_ssl" in ssl/ssl_rsa.c to avoid the problem. Otherwise the DJGPP
compilation went f