On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:47 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:36:40PM +, David Woodhouse via RT
wrote:
FWIW the Linux kernel also specifically avoids checking timestamps
altogether when validating signed modules.
You probably need a dedicated implementation
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:28:09PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
The master branch implements security levels. The default security
level does not allow anon ciphersuites. I suspect this may be your problem.
Indeed. SSL_set_security_level(ssl, 0) for this special EAP-FAST case
resolved this.
Can
On 28/07/15 16:22, Adam Eijdenberg wrote:
Sorry Rich, I didn't mean to imply it was (especially since it included
the weekend!) - I'm still trying to understand the correct workflow for
this project - do you normally prefer mail to this list or pull requests
with that type of patch? The
Sorry Rich, I didn't mean to imply it was (especially since it included the
weekend!) - I'm still trying to understand the correct workflow for this
project - do you normally prefer mail to this list or pull requests with
that type of patch? The README file talks about sending patches to this
The patch is for openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz of which file the MD5 is
38dd619b2e77cbac69b99f52a053d25a
diff '--unified=2' --recursive openssl-1.0.2d.orig/crypto/dh/dh.h openssl-1.0.2d/crypto/dh/dh.h
--- openssl-1.0.2d.orig/crypto/dh/dh.h 2015-07-09 19:57:15.0 +0800
+++
We saw your pull request. Three days is not a long time.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
HI openssl-dev,
This is my first patch, so hope I'm following the right process. The
argument parsing for openssl genrsa is missing a break; statement and
as a consequence control the users gets a set of spurious warnings about a
missing engine that they didn't actually intentionally specify. A
Hi r...@openssl.org,
Please see linked pull request for a small patch to fix various argument
parsing issues noticed in genrsa and also some other tools:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/339
Cheers, Adam
___
openssl-bugs-mod mailing list
On 28/07/15 16:54, Salz, Rich wrote:
or pull requests with that type of patch? The README file talks about
sending patches to this list, whereas the Wiki talks about GitHub pull
requests so I wanted to make sure I was following the right process.
We really need to sort that out! :-)
Can
Scenario:
:; git clone https://github.com/openssl/openssl openssl-temp
:; cd openssl-temp
:; ./config --prefix=./relpath
:; make
:; make install
[spewage snipped]
created directory `./relpath'
Cannot create directory ./relpath/.: File exists
Makefile:669: recipe for target
It seems that the simplest and most obvious thing is to indicate that you don't
care about the dates, which is what this patch does.
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Documentation states that -nrequest pnum Number of requests to accept
(default unlimited), but in practice not specifying -nrequest would have
the affect of accepting only 1 request.
Pull request to fix behavior to match docs:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/343
openssl s_server ignores all OCSP-stapling options if -rev, -www or -WWW
are enabled.
Fix by moving initialization of CTX to outside of the callback.
At same time also set options on ctx2 if available (matching how other ctx
options are set).
See pull request:
Hi,
I would like the same change as the following PR to be applied to the
OpenSSL FIPS module:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/342
How should I proceed in this case?
Should I make a pull request for the openssl:OpenSSL-fips-2_0-dev branch?
Thank you,
-- misaki
--
Oracle Solaris
When Heap32First is called while RtlAllocateHeap is executing on
another thread, the process can deadlock. The underlying bug has a
hotfix from Microsoft, but is not part of a service pack. Only Windows
7 or 2008R2 are affected:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2719306
Deadlock noted in
On 07/28/2015 03:17 PM, Misaki.Miyashita wrote:
Hi,
I would like the same change as the following PR to be applied to the
OpenSSL FIPS module:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/342
How should I proceed in this case?
Should I make a pull request for the
16 matches
Mail list logo