Re: [openssl-dev] who wants to fix travis builds?

2015-09-27 Thread Salz, Rich
> But I'd like to use this opportunity to challenge the choice of using > --strict- > warnings in [all] CI scenarios. I think it would be fine if just the Linux gcc/clang builds had the strict warnings on. IMHO. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSa

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4061] [PATCH] Request for new API to get role of SSL

2015-09-27 Thread Salz, Rich via RT
> if so, any plan to backport it? No, it's a new feature; only fixes go into releases. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4061] [PATCH] Request for new API to get role of SSL

2015-09-27 Thread Salz, Rich
> if so, any plan to backport it? No, it's a new feature; only fixes go into releases. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] who wants to fix travis builds?

2015-09-27 Thread Andy Polyakov
>>> - mingw debug and shared builds in master. >> >> While I can confirm problem with shared (fixable with attached >> patch, please double-check), I can't confirm problem with debug >> (please elaborate). > > I just opened a pull request on GitHub [0] to add your patch for > mingw shared builds