Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

The old style of complete intermix of flags and parameters is not going to happen. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] Regression: dgst command

Hello, I run my test suite for the openssl 1.1.0 version. Executing the command openssl dgst -md_gost94 -sign rsaseckey.pem -out sig.bin dgst.dat I get an error: Error setting context 47545377098440:error:0408C09D:rsa routines:check_padding_md:invalid digest:rsa_pmeth.c:413: The behavior

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

Tweaked, sigh. ; ./util/opensslwrap.sh engine - dynamic -pre engine: Cannot mix flags and engine names. engine: Use -help for summary. exit 1 ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > Tweaked, sigh. > ; ./util/opensslwrap.sh engine - dynamic -pre > engine: Cannot mix flags and engine names. > engine: Use -help for summary. > exit 1 > If engine name cannot be at any position then please keep it as is. i.e. at last position. In this

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

The different subcommands act differently in this regard. I think it's time they get streamlined, and yes, I agree with the "any order" paradigm. I might do this tonight... Cheers Richard Roumen Petrov via RT skrev: (3 januari 2016 19:31:29 CET) >Salz, Rich via RT wrote:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

Never mind that comment. Wrong thread... Richard Levitte via RT skrev: (3 januari 2016 19:55:13 CET) >The different subcommands act differently in this regard. I think it's >time they get streamlined, and yes, I agree with the "any order" >paradigm. > >I might do this

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > Please see this: > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/compare/master...richsalz:rt4194?expand=1 > It should fail with openssl engine - dynamic -pre SO_PATH:/lib/libfoo.so Help string looks good. Roumen ___

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

So you're saying just close this ticket? ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

So you're saying just close this ticket? ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > So you're saying just close this ticket? > No. My request is to restore flexible engine command line and optionally help string. I only disagree with proposed partial correction for command line. ___ openssl-dev mailing list