On Wed May 11 22:16:00 2016, dan...@haxx.se wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, that problem was fixed at some later point and I've not seen it
> trigger
> recently. I forgot to mark it as such in the bug.
OK, thanks for the update. Ticket closed.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> I've pulled the latest curl using git and OpenSSL master. I had to make one
> minor change to curl to get it to compile. I can't reproduce the problem
> with test 313: it seems to work fine. I've tried it using the verify utility
> and
Today, the IETF uses OpenSSL to digitally sign Internet-Drafts. If you care
about the details, please see RFC 5485.
We are looking to expand Internet-Draft signing, and start signing RFCs as
well. Someone has suggested that we support RFC 5126, "CMS Advanced Electronic
Signatures (CAdES)”.
If it's a feature, wait until after 1.1 and then rebase. If it's a bug or doc
fix or similar, please update now and ping.
It's the windows RNG fix/cleanup. Just updated and now no conflicts on PR.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/512
Thanks!
Joey
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To
> I haven't been keeping my PR #512 up to date since the 1.1 code freeze, is
> now a good time to start again?
If it's a feature, wait until after 1.1 and then rebase. If it's a bug or doc
fix or similar, please update now and ping.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
The summary could be phrase as “just open a GitHub PR, no need to deal
with RT”
I haven't been keeping my PR #512 up to date since the 1.1 code freeze,
is now a good time to start again?
cheers,
Joey
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
We've updated our preferred way to submit patches. Please see the CONTRIBUTING
file, which you can find here (among other places):
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING
The summary could be phrase as "just open a GitHub PR, no need to deal with RT"
We hope this will
Thank you. Closing this ticket.
On Wed May 11 15:01:07 2016, yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> They are fixed in openssl-1.1.0-pre5.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --- Kiyoshi
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Richard Levitte via RT
Thank you. Closing this ticket.
On Wed May 11 14:57:09 2016, yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is fixed in openssl-1.1.0-pre5.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --- Kiyoshi
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Richard Levitte via RT
> >
Thank you. Closing this ticket.
On Wed May 11 15:15:49 2016, yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Checked with openssl-1.1.0-pre5,
> and confirmed it is fixed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --- Kiyoshi
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Richard Levitte via RT
Thanks, applied.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4442
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing
Applied, thanks for the report.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4363
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
As a bit of follow-up here, it looks like the behavior changed from
using "Email" as a shortname for this attribute to just using the long
form "emailAddress" in commit 30911232c17f309f947156959fcbbf504c1b66fe
back in 2002. The commit message there was pretty sparse, "Some more
OID
On Tue, May 10, 2016, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[looks like there are at least three different threads now?
hence I made the Subject a bit more generic.]
> > 34371851688:error:21075075:PKCS7 routines:PKCS7_verify:certificate verify
> > error:pk7_smime.c:328:Verify error:certificate has expired
>
Cert files under
openssl-1.0.1t/test/smime-certs are expired on May 11 2016.
This makes cms-test.pl test to fail while running "make test".
Reproduced on Linux.
I think they should be updated since when cms-test.pl is failing it’s
not quite clear why it fails.
Had to go inside that test and
Hello Folks,
I'd like to suggest the "ciphers" documentation in 1.1.0 be updated to include
the old EDH names for ciphers which were renamed to DHE between 1.0.2 &
1.1.0-pre.
I think there are only two affected which are still available:
EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA & EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA.
On Thu Jan 14 17:08:13 2016, dan...@haxx.se wrote:
> Hey
>
> I've had this crash for a while with current openssl git master. It is
> perfectly reproducable using curl test 313 and I have an openssl build
> here
> with debug symbols so I can provide more info to help someone diagnose
> this,
>
Hi,
Checked with openssl-1.1.0-pre5,
and confirmed it is fixed.
Thanks,
--- Kiyoshi
- Original Message -
> From: Richard Levitte via RT
> To: yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Date: 2016/5/11, Wed 06:01
>
Hello,
They are fixed in openssl-1.1.0-pre5.
Regards,
--- Kiyoshi
- Original Message -
> From: Richard Levitte via RT
> To: yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Date: 2016/5/11, Wed 05:29
> Subject: [openssl.org
Hello,
It is fixed in openssl-1.1.0-pre5.
Thanks,
--- Kiyoshi
- Original Message -
>From: Richard Levitte via RT
>To: yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp
>Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
>Date: 2016/5/11, Wed 05:57
>Subject: [openssl.org #4452]
Patch applied in cb21df322.
Thanks.
Matt
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4387
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Am 10.05.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Richard Levitte via RT:
I understand this part. What I'm questioning is the need to set PERL to
"/usr/bin/env perl" to begin with. It's practically not different at all from
setting it to just "perl", all this does is that any time the environment
variable PERL is
Am 10.05.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Richard Levitte via RT:
> I understand this part. What I'm questioning is the need to set PERL to
> "/usr/bin/env perl" to begin with. It's practically not different at all from
> setting it to just "perl", all this does is that any time the environment
> variable
On Sat Mar 05 02:22:00 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
> cc -I.. -I../.. -I../modes -I../include -I../../include -DDSO_DLFCN
> -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_STATIC_ENGINE
> -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT
> -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m
Hi,
tests/cms-test.pl is failing, as the smime-certs/ expired yesterday / expire
today.
Can someone please generate correct new certs?
Ciao, Marcus
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:24:00AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tests/cms-test.pl is failing, as the smime-certs/ expired yesterday / expire
> today.
>
> Can someone please generate correct new certs?
Hups. I only looked at 1.0.1 branch. The certs are refreshed in 1.0.2 and
master.
On 10/05/16 18:34, Rajeswari K wrote:
> Hello openssl-dev team,
>
> Having query regarding DTLS session resumption when configured SSL_CTX
> with DTLS_ANY_VERSION.
>
> When we select SSL_CTX with DTLS_ANY_VERSION, method will be of
> DTLS_Server_method(), which will have ssl_ctx->version as
Hi,
> I got an failure at "make test" sea end of Mail
Well, at the end of the mail it says that it failed to link. It's rather
indication of something going wrong with *your* compiler setup. We more
or less stand for correctness of code and you stand for providing sane
compiler environment it
Though I don't use RedHat or it's derivatives, it's packaging file is at
least mercifully self-contained. Also, spec files can be used to
generate packaging files for other formats.
I'd advocate for leaving it in... just not very forcefully.
On 5/11/2016 12:09 AM, Richard Levitte wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I've been wondering, why do we have an openssl.spec in the OpenSSL
source? Why would we have packager material in there at all, and if
we should have such things, why only for RPMs, why not Debian, why not
stuff to build Windows .msis, why not stuff to build PCSI files (for
VMS)?
This is to
Thanks. re-closing.
On Wed May 11 03:34:26 2016, e...@efca.com wrote:
> no idea where this OLD message came from.
> In any case, do ignore, problem has been solved for many weeks.
>
> >-- Original Message --
> >
> >
> >still not working right.
> >Attached a longish log file extract.
> >But root
31 matches
Mail list logo