On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:46:02PM +, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> I don't get such warnings. Can you tell me what system and with what tool
> chain
> (including versions)?
I think that the report is correct, we must be getting away with
on most platforms. On NetBSD, for example,
1. Please see
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/75b833cc819a9d189adb0fdd56327bee600ff9e9
.
I think it would be good for OpenSSL to work with Google to integrate this
patch.
2. Is the `__chkstk` code that was added [1] to `bn_mul_mont` really
necessary? I noticed that when BoringSSL
See
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d6482a82bc2228327aa4ba98aeeecd9979542a31#diff-3aca3afd18ad75a8f6a09a9860bc6ef5R631
+ volatile BN_ULONG *table = (volatile BN_ULONG *)buf;
Why is `volatile` used here? Is it to work around the effective type
(strict aliasing) violations or for some
On Thu Apr 07 11:44:09 2016, peter.chernys...@gmail.com wrote:
> Добрый день!
> программа библиотеки BN_mod_word
> BN_ULONG BN_mod_word(const BIGNUM *a, BN_ULONG w);
>
> работает неверно на 64 бит машине при некоторых w>2^32, хотя объявлена как
> BN_ULONG (64 бита).
>
> Петр
>
> Hello!
> BN part
This has made it to master. Closing this ticket.
Cheers,
Richard
On Wed May 25 21:42:40 2016, levitte wrote:
> Patch applied, https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1129
>
> Furthermore, I merged ticket 4488 and 4489, because the solution is
> all in the
> same commit.
>
> --
> Richard Levitte
Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > Cortex-M platforms are so limited that every bit of performance and
> > space savings matters. So, I think it is definitely worthwhile to
> > support the non-NEON ARMv7-M configuration. One easy way to do this
> > would be to avoid building NEON code
>
>
> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=11208dcfb9105e8afa37233185decefd45e89e17
> made whole assembly pack Thumb2-friendly, so that now you should be able
> to compile all modules. Please, double-check.
>
>
> This is awesome!
>
> I have a question about
[Sorry for the **long** delay in responding.]
Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=11208dcfb9105e8afa37233185decefd45e89e17
> made whole assembly pack Thumb2-friendly, so that now you should be able
> to compile all modules.
I don't get such warnings. Can you tell me what system and with what tool chain
(including versions)?
On Sun Mar 20 13:07:43 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
> The missing include caused a number of "implicitly
> declared function" warnings due to use of strcmpcase and strncmpcase.
>
> $ egrep
Patch applied, https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1129
Furthermore, I merged ticket 4488 and 4489, because the solution is all in the
same commit.
--
Richard Levitte
levi...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4488
Please log in as guest with password
On Tue Mar 29 12:02:41 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> $ cat conf_lib.patch
> >>> diff --git a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
> >>> index f197714..7bc3ac0 100644
> >>> --- a/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
> >>> +++ b/crypto/conf/conf_lib.c
> >>> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ void
> >>>
> Author: Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa
> ASM implementation
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
> Signed-off-by: Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa
> ---
> +my
... and has now made it to master.
Cheers,
richard
In message <20160525.205653.1298317536965356146.levi...@openssl.org> on Wed, 25
May 2016 20:56:53 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte said:
levitte> This should solve the problem:
levitte>
levitte>
This should solve the problem:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1128
Cheers,
Richard
In message <2084b495-b2bb-4771-b9a8-d811c597c...@openssl.org> on Wed, 25 May
2016 16:58:34 +0200, Richard Levitte said:
levitte> Yes. There's a bug where the 'clean' target
Yes. There's a bug where the 'clean' target removes header files generated by
Configure. I'll fix later tonight.
Cheers
Richard
"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" skrev: (25 maj 2016 16:50:00
CEST)
>$ ./Configure darwin64-x86_64-cc threads shared zlib
$ ./Configure darwin64-x86_64-cc threads shared zlib
enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 enable-rfc3779
--prefix=/Users/ur20980/src/openssl-1.1
--openssldir=/Users/ur20980/src/openssl-1.1/etc
Configuring OpenSSL version 1.1.0-pre6-dev (0x0x1016L)
no-asan [default] OPENSSL_NO_ASAN (skip
Now that 4492 was closed, I could give this a go... and no, the proposed patch
wasn't enough, there were a few more places that needed extra quotes.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1125
Cheers,
Richard
On Tue May 24 15:46:07 2016, levitte wrote:
> I'm surprised so little is needed...
That has now made it to master.
Closing ticket, submit a new ticket if you find further issues.
Cheers,
Richard
On Tue May 24 15:45:08 2016, levitte wrote:
> I just pushed a pull request that I think solves this.
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1120
>
> Care to try it?
>
> Cheers,
>
18 matches
Mail list logo