[openssl-dev] prefer headers from source tree

Hello, Build of master branch fail of on command line is specified include path (-I ...) with headers from another openssl version. Please see attached "0002-make-templates-prepend-path-to-source-headers.patch" file with proposed modification of make template. Tested wilt unix build. Windows

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4590] accessors without const return arguments

Hello, Recently declaration of a number of get0 methods was changed to return constant values (BIGNUM). Lets me quote description of an allocator "/ECDSA_SIG_new()/ allocates a new *ECDSA_SIG* structure (note: this function also allocates the BIGNUMs) and initialize it." Now lets try to

Re: [openssl-dev] Making assembly language optimizations working onCortex-M3

> The BoringSSL works as follows: > > 1. The person building the code passes -DOPENSSL_STATIC_ARMCAP and some > other flags like -DOPENSSL_STATIC_ARMCAP_NEON, to indicate which > features are available on the target. > > 2. When OPENSSL_STATIC_ARMCAP is defined, the runtime detection of >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #2911] enhancement request: Windows RT support

In your previous mail you wrote: > Nobody got around to looking at this, sorry. I could not decode the patch > although 103K is big. Windows RT is no longer supported. Closing ticket. => no problem... Thanks francis.dup...@fdupont.fr -- Ticket here:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4298] [Bug] Random number generation failing with FIPS and Android < 5.0

There is not enough information to repeat. Please open a new ticket, post a backtrace, or whatever. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4298 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3886] [BUG] [PATCH] verify fails for 3-level cert chain when using X509v3 Authority Key Identifier

It's not clear there is a bug (in fact, the bug commentary says that). If so, please open a new ticket with a PEM file of all the certs in the chain. Or perhaps post to openssl-users mailing list. Closing ticket. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3886 Please log in as

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3811] [BUG REPORT] - Missing register name in aes-x86_64.s

Cannot reproduce. Attempt to provide a work-around/fix hasn't had any response. Closing ticket. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3811 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

The warnings are annoying but harmless. running 'make depend' is required. Closing ticket. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4169 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3016] openssl ts fix

No plans to do this. Please re-open the ticket if it's *really* needed for interop. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3016 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #2964] OBJ_nid2obj() result value should be const

Updated the docs in master and 1.0.2 to explain that these really are const-like objects. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2964 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4589] simplifying writing code that is 1.0.x and 1.1.x compatible

Hi, at borgbackup project, we are currently trying to make it compatible with OpenSSL 1.0.x and 1.1.x. For the opaque cipher ctx this worked quite easily like this: https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/pull/1193/files#diff-85ee6ebe1cdcfd4a4699c3913d519b27R23 I could not have a cipher ctx

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #2911] enhancement request: Windows RT support

Nobody got around to looking at this, sorry. I could not decode the patch although 103K is big. Windows RT is no longer supported. Closing ticket. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2911 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing

Re: [openssl-dev] 1.1 release being delayed

> > And as far as regressions after beta 2 release are concerned, it looks > > like there was a change in the API that is not backwards compatible. I > > was hoping this would not happen after the "Beta 2 - Opaque work > > complete". Did I misunderstand what that note means? > > > > The