Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4590] accessors without const return arguments

2016-08-03 Thread Roumen Petrov via RT
Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > On Sat Jun 25 22:09:59 2016, open...@roumenpetrov.info wrote: >> Above is reason the request to remove const from return argument of get0 >> methods. > We had a discussion about this and the preference was to have get methods > retain const for various reasons. > >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4612] Appcrash on SSL_CTX_new(SSLv2_server_method()) on windows 7 x64 with OpenSSL-1.0.1t

2016-08-03 Thread Kaduk, Ben via RT
On 08/03/2016 10:12 AM, Viktor Kolodrevskiy wrote: > Hi, > > If I want to enable ssl2 under windows build, will need to pass > parameters: > no-asm enable-ssl2 -DOPENSSL_USE_IPV6=0 VC-WIN32 > > So if I will need to build openssl under linux, parameters should be: > no-asm enable-ssl2

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4612] Appcrash on SSL_CTX_new(SSLv2_server_method()) on windows 7 x64 with OpenSSL-1.0.1t

2016-08-03 Thread Viktor Kolodrevskiy via RT
Hi, If I want to enable ssl2 under windows build, will need to pass parameters: no-asm enable-ssl2 -DOPENSSL_USE_IPV6=0 VC-WIN32 So if I will need to build openssl under linux, parameters should be: no-asm enable-ssl2 -DOPENSSL_USE_IPV6=0 Is that right? > On Jul 11, 2016, at 20:20,

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4612] Appcrash on SSL_CTX_new(SSLv2_server_method()) on windows 7 x64 with OpenSSL-1.0.1t

2016-08-03 Thread Viktor Kolodrevskiy
Hi, If I want to enable ssl2 under windows build, will need to pass parameters: no-asm enable-ssl2 -DOPENSSL_USE_IPV6=0 VC-WIN32 So if I will need to build openssl under linux, parameters should be: no-asm enable-ssl2 -DOPENSSL_USE_IPV6=0 Is that right? > On Jul 11, 2016, at 20:20,

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4602] Missing accessors

2016-08-03 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20160803142331.gd2...@nikhef.nl> on Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:23:31 +0200, Mischa Salle said: msalle> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:41:55PM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote: msalle> > msalle> By the way, even for RFC proxies I still have the problem that setting msalle> >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4584] Self test failures under X32

2016-08-03 Thread Matt Caswell via RT
On 02/08/16 01:26, noloa...@gmail.com via RT wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: >> >> >> On 19/07/16 14:41, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: >>> Hi Jeff, >>> >>> I'm going to assume that a newer checkout of the master branch won't change >>> much, so

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4602] Missing accessors

2016-08-03 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20160803.154155.2198714958292922881.levi...@openssl.org> on Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:41:55 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte said: levitte> In message <20160803131344.gb2...@nikhef.nl> on Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:13:44 +0200, Mischa Salle said: levitte>

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4602] Missing accessors

2016-08-03 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20160803131344.gb2...@nikhef.nl> on Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:13:44 +0200, Mischa Salle said: msalle> Hi Richard, msalle> msalle> apologies for the delayed answer, I was caught up in work... msalle> msalle> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:50:14PM +0200, Richard Levitte