On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>> How about something like this.. A VC-WIN32-XP target that has
>> everything needed to make a max compatibility target
>> When building under VS2012 and above.. (I also tested in VS2015)
>> adds CFLAGS /arch:IA32 -D_USING_V110_SDK71_
>> adds
> How about something like this.. A VC-WIN32-XP target that has
> everything needed to make a max compatibility target
> When building under VS2012 and above.. (I also tested in VS2015)
> adds CFLAGS /arch:IA32 -D_USING_V110_SDK71_
> adds BIN_LDFLAGS=/subsystem:console,5.01 /opt:ref
How about
se
If you want to dedicate a target to /arch:ia32, I can’t object or
complain. VC-WIN32-XP sounds like a good choice for that.
--
Regards,
Uri Blumenthal
On 8/26/16, 17:27, "openssl-dev on behalf of Scott Ware"
wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
> wrote:
>> O
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
wrote:
> On 8/26/16, 17:04, "openssl-dev on behalf of Andy Polyakov"
> wrote:
>
>>So suggestion is to impose /arch:ia32 on all users. Well, I personally
>>have lesser problem with that (as most most performance-critical
>>assembly co
On 8/26/16, 17:04, "openssl-dev on behalf of Andy Polyakov"
wrote:
>So suggestion is to impose /arch:ia32 on all users. Well, I personally
>have lesser problem with that (as most most performance-critical
>assembly code paths will be compiled anyway, processor capabilities
>detected at run-time,
>> When building with Visual Studio 2008 SSE is disabled by default. When
>> building with Visual Studio 2012 and above you must supply a new flag
>> /arch:IA32 to not build with SSE. Would it be acceptable to update the
>> Configure process to add the /arch:IA32 if Visual Studio 2012 or
>> greater
In message
on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:31:57 -0400, Scott Ware said:
wsware> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Scott Ware wrote:
wsware> > When building with Visual Studio 2008 SSE is disabled by default. When
wsware> > building with Visual Studio 2012 and above you must supply a new flag
wsware> >
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Scott Ware wrote:
> When building with Visual Studio 2008 SSE is disabled by default. When
> building with Visual Studio 2012 and above you must supply a new flag
> /arch:IA32 to not build with SSE. Would it be acceptable to update the
> Configure process to add t
Considering all of the API changes in 1.1, I think changing to the
new library names are actually very useful, no chance of accidentally using old
DLLs
>-- Original Message --
>
>In message <7ff7678e-3c4c-6343-3a5b-b2aa0caf7...@yahoo.com> on Fri, 26 Aug
>2016 01:14:22 -0400, Ray Satiro said:
>
On 08/25/2016 04:33 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> NCC Group has prepared (or begun preparing) a patch that integrates
> fuzzing of OpenSSL.
Exciting stuff, most of which I will ignore for now and ask a targeted
question.
> - Because ossltest cooks MD5 to output a constant value, OpenSSL's RNG
> become
When building with Visual Studio 2008 SSE is disabled by default. When
building with Visual Studio 2012 and above you must supply a new flag
/arch:IA32 to not build with SSE. Would it be acceptable to update the
Configure process to add the /arch:IA32 if Visual Studio 2012 or
greater is detected? T
Hi,
Is there any negative impact ofusing SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file() and
SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file()
together?
My application loads thecertificate using SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file()and
loads the complete chain using SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file().
Theapplication w
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 03:14:58PM +, asmar...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Is there any negative impact ofusing SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file() and
> SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file() together?
The first is redundant and should avoided.
> My application loads thecertificate using SSL_CTX_use_certif
Matt Caswell wrote:
|> Matt Caswell wrote:
|>|On 25/08/16 22:14, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>|> OpenSSL wrote:
|>|>| OpenSSL version 1.1.0 released
|>|>
|>|> A bit distressing that it is me again, as if i would have
|>|> something to do with that..., but: the tag is missing.
|>|
|>|Re
|N'morning UK. (^.^)
Ok i'm awake, you've created a new branch for that.
Thanks.
--steffen
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
On 26/08/16 11:42, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> N'morning UK. (^.^)
>
> Matt Caswell wrote:
> |On 25/08/16 22:14, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> |> OpenSSL wrote:
> |>| OpenSSL version 1.1.0 released
> |>
> |> A bit distressing that it is me again, as if i would have
> |> something to do with
N'morning UK. (^.^)
Matt Caswell wrote:
|On 25/08/16 22:14, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> OpenSSL wrote:
|>| OpenSSL version 1.1.0 released
|>
|> A bit distressing that it is me again, as if i would have
|> something to do with that..., but: the tag is missing.
|
|Really? I seem to be ab
In message <7ff7678e-3c4c-6343-3a5b-b2aa0caf7...@yahoo.com> on Fri, 26 Aug 2016
01:14:22 -0400, Ray Satiro said:
raysatiro> I am part of a project that has several build systems, and two in
raysatiro> particular are not dynamically generated, a makefile and a number of
raysatiro> Visual Studio p
18 matches
Mail list logo