Re: [openssl-dev] status of libefence (electric fence)

2016-10-21 Thread John Denker
On 10/21/2016 04:14 PM, Salz, Rich asked: > Is electric fence even available any more? It's bundled with current Debian and Ubuntu. >From the README: "This version should run on all systems that support POSIX mmap() and mprotect(). This includes Linux, Unix, and I think even BeOS." --

[openssl-dev] anonymous bug report

2016-10-21 Thread Salz, Rich
(came in via mixmaster anonymous remailer) $ openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 Typo in NEWS file: Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2g and OpenSSL 1.0.2h [3 May 2016] ... o Remove LOW from the DEFAULT cipher list. This removes singles DES from the default. Replace

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20161022.012155.944333974616925164.levi...@openssl.org> on Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:21:55 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte said: levitte> In message <21c4f180c97a4da6b716f852ac4d4...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:14:43 +, "Salz, Rich"

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <21c4f180c97a4da6b716f852ac4d4...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:14:43 +, "Salz, Rich" said: rsalz> Is electric fence even available any more? Just kill it. I just looked around, and it looks like you're right. Awright, I'll do

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte
Actually, -lefence comes from much further back in time. If you look at the configuration strings in Configure in version 1.0.2, you'll find debug-linux-elf, with that dreaded -lefence. Back in that version, ./config treats -d by prefixing the desired target with 'debug-', so 'debug-linux-elf'

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Salz, Rich
Is electric fence even available any more? Just kill it. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
During some testing today, I ended up trying to do a build of 1.1.0b configured for linux-elf --debug (with no-asm to work around some issue that was not my primary concern at the time), which failed due to a missing -lefence. The corresponding linux-x86_64 build on the same machine succeeds. It

Re: [openssl-dev] "typo" in SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version.pod

2016-10-21 Thread Salz, Rich
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1762 -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev