>> Are we saying that it absolutely will not support ARM7 thumb mode anymore?
>
> Nobody is saying that. We're saying that if the address-space is 16bit,
> openssl will not work.
16-bit in original request refers to instructions' size, not address
space. But it's actually a misnomer, as Thumb,
Viktor,
Thank you so very much for that - I will definitely look into that.
--
Sean Graham
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Dec 19, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> >
> >> Are we saying that it absolutely will not support ARM7 thumb mode
> anymor
Hi Guys,
My apologies for the blunt reply -- merely trying to be clear -- and thank
you for your answers!
Would anyone happen to have any reference material that I could look at
which would help me along this line? I apologize for the newb questions.
Specifically I already have a gcc toolchain
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>> Are we saying that it absolutely will not support ARM7 thumb mode anymore?
>
> Nobody is saying that. We're saying that if the address-space is 16bit,
> openssl will not work.
>
>> Wouldn't the generic C-only version (no ASM) support pret
> Are we saying that it absolutely will not support ARM7 thumb mode anymore?
Nobody is saying that. We're saying that if the address-space is 16bit,
openssl will not work.
> Wouldn't the generic C-only version (no ASM) support pretty much any platform?
Probably.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
We are saying that we don't support 16-bit platforms and haven't
really done so for a long time. The C-only version is no exception.
However, the response was that 32- and 64-bit operations and numbers
are supported on that device, so it should still be possible to play
with.
Cheers,
Richard
In
Are we saying that it absolutely will not support ARM7 thumb mode anymore?
Wouldn't the generic C-only version (no ASM) support pretty much any
platform?
--
Sean Graham
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Richard Levitte
wrote:
> In message <72e690f1b12147588b1dc3e7ee93c...@usma1ex-dag1
In message
<72e690f1b12147588b1dc3e7ee93c...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Mon,
19 Dec 2016 18:22:30 +, "Salz, Rich" said:
rsalz>
rsalz> > I have an embedded device which runs an ARM7T armv4t 16-bit thumb
platform.
rsalz>
rsalz> I don't think openssl ever really ran on 16bit.
Hi!
Thanks for the reply - I didn't think it actually made the mailing list.
The thumb platform supports all 32-bit operations and even 64-bit numbers,
so I wouldn't expect it to be a problem.
The ./Configure does explicitly talk about thumb mode compiling, so I
imagine there must be support for
> I have an embedded device which runs an ARM7T armv4t 16-bit thumb platform.
I don't think openssl ever really ran on 16bit.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
10 matches
Mail list logo