[openssl.org #1153] Mingw patch for OpenSSL 0.9.8

2005-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
addresses. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org

[openssl.org #1150] 0.9.8 bug report

2005-07-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
-- 1st referenced by ../libcrypto.a(e_bf.o). Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and dsos are loaded. ld32: INFO152: Output file removed because of error. gmake[2]: *** [link_app.irix] Error 2/ thanks in advance -- AH Computer-Systeme Götz Fischer Senior Consu

Re: [openssl.org #1109] Please urgently impelment "-utf8" parameter in "openssl ca" command

2005-07-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
If You think so Ok then ;) Let's leave it as it is. Thank You very much and once again sorry for the inconvenience. Best regards Stefan - Original Message - From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wedne

Re: [openssl.org #1109] Please urgently impelment "-utf8" parameter in "openssl ca" command

2005-07-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ia RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:17 AM Subject: [openssl.org #1109] Please urgently impelment "-utf8" parameter in "openssl ca" command > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jul 6 01:10:41 2005]: > >> W

Re: [openssl.org #1109] Please urgently impelment "-utf8" parameter in "openssl ca" command

2005-07-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
my second diff file in order not to use config options? If yes - where to send it ? - Original Message - From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:17 AM Subject: [openssl.org #1109] Please urgentl

Re: [openssl.org #1109] Ticket Resolved

2005-07-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
I mean this one: - Original Message - From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:14 AM Subject: [openssl.org #1109] Ticket Resolved > According to our records, your request has been resolved.

Re: [openssl.org #1109] Ticket Resolved

2005-07-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Would You please apply the second DIFF file in sead of the first one ? - Original Message - From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:14 AM Subject: [openssl.org #1109] Ticket Resolved > Accor

Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
> So the bug report can be removed, right? Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug. > (and *please* keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] among the recipients. It's quite > hard to follow history in the database when people keep skipping that > address) Apo

[openssl.org #1136] 0.9.8-beta6 on DJGPP

2005-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
: unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 3) Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Ma

[openssl.org #1135] 0.9.8-beta7-dev and DJGPP

2005-06-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
-- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager

[openssl.org #1131] Patch for 0.9.8beta6 by_dir.c

2005-06-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
} + else ret=add_cert_dir(ld,argp,(int)argl); break; -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.ope

[openssl.org #1127] openssl-0.9.8-beta6: two minor problem man pages during install

2005-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
anager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #1103] bug: openssl-0.9.8-beta4 "make depend" fails in separate tree configuration

2005-06-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
nssl-0.9.8/openssl-0.9.8-beta6/./README end snip --- __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #1085] DJGPP patch for 0.9.8-beta3

2005-06-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 12 03:21:44 2005]: > > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > > > > Whatever the problem is, I do not agree with removing 'set -e'. > >Setting

Re: [openssl.org #1110] DEVRAMDOM define in rand_unix.c

2005-06-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
-- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1113] openssl-0.9.8-beta5 - install fails on "../../util/pod2man.pl: Invalid man page"

2005-06-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
t `install_docs' __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #1103] Ticket Resolved

2005-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
nager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1111] Test passed: OpenSSL 0.9.8 beta 5 on SuSE 9.3

2005-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #1085] DJGPP patch for 0.9.8-beta3

2005-06-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 31 17:03:31 2005]: > > > There is one problem with beta-3 which also occurred in earler > > versions, but which I had overlooked, since no errors were generated. > > On DJGPP, install_doc

[openssl.org #1103] bug: openssl-0.9.8-beta4 "make depend" fails in separate tree configuration

2005-06-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
_ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1085] DJGPP patch for 0.9.8-beta3

2005-05-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
because of non-portable assumptions about return values made by the makefile. The attached patch fixes it for DJGPP. I had previously reported this problem (see rt tickets #932 and 989). Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[openssl.org #1081] 0.9.8 beta 2 on solaris 10

2005-05-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
_ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1077] Bug report on slowness

2005-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1076] Bug report

2005-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
o: DES-EDE3-CBC,43ECEF9760C83CB8 WLaeQ4McbSzetcE4C1PizoZE8QJVceYBPVmr4WgGg29KeiBt/LjUFc9Dafv6W0t8 rCJEp8Wy7JsyuWqcWrJzvRiyyn72XK3CGZqNnSYuFj6UyJX2RPsT7icfoWLYtgxz HxZBFOKI1o/eeWb1orkgb0N9U9Su0tLQqPIbXTJ1mxTS7sahBSN6F5zdfwc3Z+s0 ChZNsC71IRASHA8671PtEQ8fWngWeg3BGm34wphmS

Re: [openssl.org #1020] [PATCH] restore pkcs12 -CSP in 0.9.8

2005-05-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 6 19:39:25 2005]: > > > Hi, > > > > Somewhen between 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 (I first noticed it around 6 months > > ago), > > PKCS12 creation was refactored, and the new code left out the pkcs12 > &g

Re: [openssl.org #1068] AutoReply: X509_NAME_add_entry: inserting with loc == 0 and set == 0 creates wrong set

2005-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
uot;i-1". Regards, Frank __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1068] X509_NAME_add_entry: inserting with loc == 0 and set == 0 creates wrong set

2005-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
0.9.5a up to the current CVS version I checked. Regards, Frank __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1067] OpenSSL symmetric crypto padding check incompatible with XMLENC

2005-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
values of other octets are not +* predictable. Thus to implement XMLENC decryption with +* openssl it is necessary to disable this code. +* -- 11.5.2005, Sampo Kellomaki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) +* +* [XMLENC] D. Eas

[openssl.org #1053] Configure: GCC x86: option -m486 deprecated

2005-05-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1052] openssl ca: generate subjectAltName from config

2005-05-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1051] SSL_CTX_set_default_paths

2005-05-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
dn't it be checking for the environment variable first, then getting the default if no environment variable is specified (the way by_file_ctrl does in crypto/x509/by_file.c)? Sorry if I am misreading what that function is doing. The c

[openssl.org #1042] SSL_shutdown returns 0 (retry) after EPIPE sys error.

2005-04-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
phone (collect), so that the sender's address records can be corrected." __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

calling openssl function from a win32 project ?

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1020] [PATCH] restore pkcs12 -CSP in 0.9.8

2005-03-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1004] dgst: unknown option "-md5" ...

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
zlib-dynamic shared make all build-shared >$MAKELOG Regards, jens. -- +---[ Jens Elkner ]----+ | Walther-Rathenau-Str. 58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 39104 M

[openssl.org #1002] Problem with mingw build of 0.9.8

2005-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
er: gcc -DDSO_WIN32 -mno-cygwin -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall OPENSSLDIR: "d:/cygwin/mingw/ssl" Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

[openssl.org #999] Configure support for NetBSD/amd64

2005-01-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
-m486 -Wall::(unknown):::BN_LLONG ${x86_gcc_des} ${x86_gcc_opts}::dlfcn:bsd-gcc-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR)", -- J.T. Conklin __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #989] DJGPP patches for 0.9.8 and 0.9.7

2005-01-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
SL_SYSNAME_MSDOS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -I/dev/env/WATT_ROOT/inc -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -W -Wall -DDEVRANDOM="/dev/urandom$$" OPENSSLDIR: "/dev/env/DJDIR/ssl" Since I am in the

[openssl.org #984] X509_NAME modified bit doesn't cover entry data changes.

2004-12-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #983] Change day expire date CA

2004-12-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #978] AIX 5.1 openssl-0.9.7e does not install

2004-11-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Paul Tedaldi | Informatikdienste|Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Universitaet Zuerich | Winterthurerstr. 190 |Tel:+41 (0)44 635 4523 CH-8057 Zuerich

[openssl.org #977] openssl s_client not follow default CApath

2004-11-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
path. Kind regards Paul Paul Tedaldi | Informatikdienste|Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Universitaet Zuerich | Winterthurerstr. 190 |Tel:+41 (0)44 635 4523 CH

Re: [openssl.org #815] 0.9.7c wont build -mcpu=k6 is a bad value

2004-11-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
tware these days requires the new version of GCC. Sadly the Raq3 has been orphaned. There is no viable upgrade path. The conversion to another system was very painful. But ultimately necessary. Good Luck, -- Erik - Original Message - From: " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTE

[openssl.org #976] OpenSSL 0.9.7e Pocket PC 2003 Compile Error

2004-11-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
27;0x2' Stop. I'm compiling openssl for Pocket PC 2003 for ARM. Any Suggestions? Thanks. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [E

[openssl.org #973] openssl dgst -rmd160 /tmp/very_large_file fail

2004-11-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
thanks, R. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #970] build error 0.9.7e

2004-11-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
bolic \ -Wl,--whole-archive lib$$i.a \ -Wl,--no-whole-archive $$libs ${EX_LIBS} -lc ) || exit 1; \ libs="-l$$i $$libs"; \ done Regards, -- +---[ Jens Elkner ]----+ | Walther-Rathenau-Str. 58 [E

RE: [SPAM] [openssl.org #961] typo in openssl.cnf

2004-11-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Here goes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] misc]# ./CA.pl -newreq Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key .++ ++ writing new private key to 'newreq.pem' Enter PEM pass phrase: Verifying - Enter PEM pass phrase: - You are about to be aske

[openssl.org #963] two more openssl-0.9.7e modules need to include e_os.h

2004-10-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SPAM] [openssl.org #961] typo in openssl.cnf

2004-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
AM] [openssl.org #961] typo in openssl.cnf > From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, October 28, 2004 12:14 pm > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 28 18:10:51 2004]: > > > I'm not sure wha

RE: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [openssl.org #961] typo in openssl.cnf

2004-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Thu, October 28, 2004 8:51 amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]I don't think you really wanted to write that:On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:39:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:> > <div>I have had trouble with&nbsp;several ver

RE: [SPAM] Re: [openssl.org #961] typo in openssl.cnf

2004-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ia RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Wed, October 27, 2004 3:09 pmTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:44:56 +0200 (METDST), "[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:rt> This may be old news, but there

[openssl.org #961] typo in openssl.cnf

2004-10-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #943] make test failed

2004-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
olution... Thanks, Shawn __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #948] Sorry is a know bug

2004-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #948] Certificate expired

2004-09-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Mon Aug 16 09:01:18 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Output: openssl verify -verbose /var/www/webmailcert/server.crt /var/www/webmailcert/server.crt: /C=ES/ST=Espa\xF1a/L=Espa\xF1a/O=lrats/OU=web/CN=correoweb.lrats.com/emailAd [EMAIL PROTECTED] error 18 at 0 depth lookup:self signed certificate /C

Parsing problem in X509_NAME with PostalAddress

2004-09-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbH Tel: +49 911 9968 246 __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test of 0.9.8 under DJGPP (was Re: [openssl.org #932] Patch for 0.9.8 (DJGPP))

2004-09-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
all -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM OPENSSLDIR: "/dev/env/DJDIR/ssl" I am attaching the patch for eng_padlock.c and am also submitting it to the US Bureau of Industry and Security. Doug -- Doug Kaufman In

[openssl.org #838] REQ: Creating a BIO from a FILE* should retain (TEXT) access modes

2004-09-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
that tries UNIX and MSDOS > newlines, this basically forces the developer to use the BIO routines > instead, making the write routines with FILE* useless. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.opens

Re: [openssl.org #932] Patch for 0.9.8 (DJGPP)

2004-08-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
k it under them > under DJGPP:-) Cheers. A. I'll try to download the latest and test. I may not have time for 2 or 3 days, however. Revised patch also submitted to the US Bureau of Industry and Security. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #942] OpenSSL 0.9.7d ./config error

2004-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
tp://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #941] ./config error

2004-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
SL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #934] Patch for 0.9.8 (mingw)

2004-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ill break strict-aliasing rules -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTE

[openssl.org #932] Patch for 0.9.8 (DJGPP)

2004-08-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
RMD160_ASM OPENSSLDIR: "/dev/env/DJDIR/ssl" Since I am in the US, a copy of the patch is being submitted to the US Bureau of Industry and Security. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: [openssl.org #930] Patch for DJGPP / OpenSSL 0.9.7-stable

2004-08-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
y and Security. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated

[openssl.org #930] Patch for DJGPP / OpenSSL 0.9.7-stable

2004-08-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
OpenSSL under DJGPP besides me and Gisle Vanem. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #924] Patch for 0.9.7-stable (mingw)

2004-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
g P.S. For those reading this on openssl-dev, the patch can be found via the response tracker. -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

[openssl.org #905] target linux-elf-arm requires -ldl linker option

2004-06-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #895] AEP engine breaks on Linux with pthreads

2004-06-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
allbacks can avoid it altogether than there's just fine with me (eg. presumably we could do away with getpid() altogether and replace any occurances of it with something abstract that can be given meaning externally). Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [openssl.org #895] AEP engine breaks on Linux with pthreads

2004-06-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ll in the AEP engine with CRYPTO_thread_id(). (You're probably better in this case to change the pid_t types to "unsigned long" too, matching the CRYPTO_thread_id() prototype.) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ _

[openssl.org #318] ssl installation error msg

2004-05-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
e: Fatal error: Command failed for target `sub_all' Thanks and Regards JeyaPrakash.R SEDBA 25,Steeple Reach Chennai 28118900 ext 4023,4048 ______ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #884]

2004-05-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
p;v2=1.50.2.9 > > Further discussion is here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17162.html > > Cheers > > Matt > > On Tue, 11 May 2004 17:58:10 +0200 (METDST) > " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >

[openssl.org #875] Trying to compile OpenSSL.v0.9.7d on CygWin and Windows2000.

2004-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
273E662C97 EE72995EF42640C550B9013FAD0761353C7086A272C24088BE94769FD16650 verify group order ok combined multiplication . ok cat ./p ./p.clear differ: char 2, line 1 make[2]: *** [test_enc] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/openssl-0.9.7d/test' make[1]: *** [tests] Error 2 make[1]: Lea

[openssl.org #870] PEM_read_bio_PrivateKey: PEM_STRING_PKCS8 memory leak

2004-04-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #865] ttls use in openssl

2004-04-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
, Josh __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #857] Pocket PC (MIPS) missing IO fns

2004-03-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
o it over the broken fn in core.dll. --Steve "Richard Levitte via RT"

[openssl.org #857] Pocket PC (MIPS) missing IO fns

2004-03-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
m or even a runtime exception if a stub io.h was included. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated L

RE: [openssl.org #855] Major memory leak in OpenSSL using threads

2004-03-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
I agree with closing the issue - I believe the session caching problem is in mod_ssl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Thorpe via RT Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 9:45 AM To: Avery, Ken Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [openssl.org

RE: [openssl.org #854] randfile.c doesn't complile on some platforms

2004-03-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ction mentioned was added between 0.9.7c and 0.9.7d. -lee > -Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of via RT > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 1:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [openssl.org #854]

RE: [openssl.org #849] WIN32 compile problems

2004-03-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
nal symbol SSL_COMP_get_compression_method out32dll\ssleay32.lib : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals LINK : fatal error LNK1141: failure during build of exports file NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x475' Stop. > -----Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &

RE: [openssl.org #849] WIN32 compile problems

2004-03-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
d to solve the problem. I'll be happy to download the latest version of OpenSSL and try again, if that helps you out. Thanks, Mike Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Richard Levitte via

[openssl.org #849] WIN32 compile problems

2004-03-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
e found in crypto/asn1/asn1_lib.c Need to add asn1_lib.obj as a dependency to SSLOBJ Thanks for all the hard work you have put into this project! If I had more active brain cells I would love to help you out. Mike Straw [EMAIL

[openssl.org #838] REQ: Creating a BIO from a FILE* should retain (TEXT) access modes

2004-03-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
e BIO routines instead, making the write routines with FILE* useless. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Ma

Re: [openssl.org #788] sse2 bn_mul_add_words: tsu notification - encryption

2004-03-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ll be able to clean things up for final inclusion. thanks -dean SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU SUBMITTED BY: dean gaudet SUBMITTED FOR: dean gaudet POINT OF CONTACT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE and/or FAX: 408 919 3086 MANUFACTURER: n/a PRODUCT NAME/MODEL #: openssl ECCN: 5D002 this patch introduces dynamic sele

[openssl.org #833] PEM_read_bio_PrivateKey unencrypted read bug

2004-02-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
509_NAME types. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #831] -issuerhash

2004-02-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Attached is a patch to add a -issuerhash command to openssl x509 (against 0.9.7c) /Sam -- Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago 630-252-1752 __ OpenSSL P

[openssl.org #823] openssl 0.9.7c build fails

2004-02-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
]: Leaving directory `/sd3/e/ftp/pub/net/openssl-0.9.7c/test' make: *** [sub_all] Error 1 fixed it by adding "#include " to crypto/des/des_locl.h and adding a link "../../e_os.h" in include/openssl/ -- Bruce Becker+1 416 410 0879 GTS N

[openssl.org #820] openssl 0.9.7c bug

2004-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
+1 416 410 0879 GTS Network Administration Toronto, Ont. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #816] Bug report: some engines leave dangling DSO* after DSO_free

2004-01-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #645] openssl make error

2004-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Graz mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone +43 (0)316 / 28 66 60 - 20 Web: http://www.bitmedia.cc ++ Privat: Phone: 0699 10 12 57 56 ++ Learning When-,What- Wherever you want

[openssl.org #809] enc(1) exits with 0 even after write errors

2004-01-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
i was wondering why `openssl des -e -out file` produces a zero sized file and exits with 0. so i straced it: [...] write(3, "|[EMAIL PROTECTED],"..., 32768) = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on device) read(0, "0\234\224\7F8\201\250F\224(\324+\250~}\347\366\372r\343"..., 8192) = 2

[openssl.org #808] OpenSSL 0.9.7c fails to link on AIX 4.2.1

2004-01-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ion. collect2: ld returned 8 exit status make: The error code from the last command is 1. -Ric __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

Re: [openssl.org #743] Bug in AES_cbc_encrypt

2003-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
e patch was in fact applied :-) -- Jon Bright Silicon Circus Ltd. http://www.siliconcircus.com __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTEC

[openssl.org #799] extending openssl config to add X509v3 extension support (fwd)

2003-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
This time with the diff attached. Take care, Bill -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:25:47 -0800 (PST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: William Studenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: extending openssl config to add X509v3 extension suppo

[openssl.org #799] extending openssl config to add X509v3 extension support

2003-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry this has taken so long, but the "rt" tab on the home page had escaped my notice, so I didn't know where to send the change. :-) > I'm working on a project that is using X509 certs for custom uses. As a > part

[openssl.org #795] Uninitialized Variables, Prototype Mismatches, Portability

2003-12-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
7; for consistency. and to reduce linking in stuff unnecessarily. (13) ssl\ssl_sess.c, function timeout() -- may I humbly suggest that this function be renamed uniquely, such as SESSION_timeout() to minimize symbol clash. Thank you for your considerations. Henry Luis Echelon Corporation __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #788] AutoReply: [PATCH] up to 1.4x RSA throughput using SSE2

2003-12-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
eryone has to call that function before using libcrypto. -dean __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auto

Re: [openssl.org #788] [PATCH] up to 1.4x RSA throughput using SSE2

2003-12-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ironment and instantiate a static > class with appropriate constructor. A. i'd also be happy to use .init and restrict this to working on ELF systems... plus i know there's something similar for windoze, i'll dig it up. -dean ______ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #788] [PATCH] up to 1.4x RSA throughput using SSE2

2003-12-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
s enabled.) do you know if there's any method i can rely on to be called when PIC code is loaded? thanks -dean ______ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #788] AutoReply: [PATCH] up to 1.4x RSA throughput using SSE2

2003-12-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
his infrastructure. -dean __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #784] Library cleanup functionality

2003-12-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
ing and I'll dig). Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

<    1   2   3   4   >