Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: >>We will probably not apply your change to the 0.9.6 line of >>development, because it's a rather big change, and we try to avoid >>that within the same line of development (for now, 0.9.x is a line of >>development, so 0.9.7 is a different one, as is 0.9.8 (in development >>right now, and where most if the bleeding edge hacking is done)). We >>will definitely take a closer look at your patch for 0.9.7 and 0.9.8. > > Anymore news about this issue? Meaning: are there anymore missing > prototypes in the 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 trees, respectively? > I have tagged this ticket with the 0.9.7 keyword to be kept in mind. > If no more prototypes are missing in 0.9.7, this ticket should be > closed.
Hi, thanks for checking back on this. I'm just using whatever is in FreeBSD, which currently is still at version 0.9.6g, so I can't easily test 0.9.7 or 0.9.8. However, my particular problem is very simple to duplicate. Just do this: $ echo "#include <openssl/ssl.h>" > xx.c $ cc -Wstrict-prototypes xx.c In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:116, from xx.c:1: /usr/include/openssl/comp.h:15: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/include/openssl/comp.h:16: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/include/openssl/comp.h:17: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/include/openssl/comp.h:18: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/include/openssl/comp.h:19: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/include/openssl/comp.h:20: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ...etc etc... Cheers, -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]