__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted Mittelstaedt schrieb:
>>From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>openssl has evolved to a very important library in Linux distribution. A
>>lot of cryptographic applications link to it including system libraries
>>like pam modules and apache m
/10/msg00454.html
Christoph
--
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
--
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
4). All the
distributions (I know) use these version numbers as sonames. So this is
correct.
But it is not enough, because as I said, different libraries could link
against different (major) versions of openssl and so cause conflicts.
Christoph
--
====
binaries.
Christoph
--
Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
Fax: +49-6131-3922856
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
avior for 0.9.8. Therefore,
>I'll make sure this ticket has 0.9.8 as milestone.
Is there a solution in the meantime for users having the problem, that
they can't renew their certificate? See attachement.
Christoph
--
======
ong report.
Christoph
--
========
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
Fax: +49-6131-3922856
n an try again.
Christoph
--
========
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
Fax: +49-6131-3922856
__
OpenSSL Project
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
b 2003 17:18:11 -0600
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#180067: openssl: 0.9.7 causes gcc in sid to output warnings
Reply-To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Argh, you are right. When I tried to verify the problem. I only testet
the 0.9.6g binary but had the 0.9.6c libraries installed. So I assume,
the submitter of the bug made a similar mistake.
Sorry, to bug you.
Christoph
Am Don, 2002-09-19 um 15.23 schrieb Lutz Jaenicke via RT:
>
> [[EMAIL PRO
Argh, you are right. When I tried to verify the problem. I only testet
the 0.9.6g binary but had the 0.9.6c libraries installed. So I assume,
the submitter of the bug made a similar mistake.
Sorry, to bug you.
Christoph
Am Don, 2002-09-19 um 15.23 schrieb Lutz Jaenicke via RT:
>
> [[EMAIL PROT
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Mit, 2002-06-05 um 08.12 schrieb Richard Levitte via RT:
>
> BN_pseudo_rand_range() was given in the synopsis exactly as you
> requested, since 0.9.6c (or at least, that's what I can make out by
> checking with our repository). I must say that I have some difficulty
> doing anything with
Am Mit, 2002-06-05 um 08.12 schrieb Richard Levitte via RT:
>
> BN_pseudo_rand_range() was given in the synopsis exactly as you
> requested, since 0.9.6c (or at least, that's what I can make out by
> checking with our repository). I must say that I have some difficulty
> doing anything with t
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marek Michalkiewicz writes:
> Package: libssl0.9.6
> Version: 0.9.6b-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: sid
>
> Not sure how hard would be to do this, but instead of so many dual
> SSL/non-SSL versions of various packages, it might be a good idea
> to have a libssl-dummy package (in main) tha
Bodo Moeller writes:
> Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Wichert Akkerman writes:
>
> >> Package: openssl
> >> Version: 0.9.6-1
> >> Severity: normal
> >>
> >> The HISTORY section of RAND_ad
g changed sources?
Christoph
--
====
Christoph Martin, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--export-a-crypto-system-sig -RSA-3-lines-PERL--
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihtt
sources and patches.
The best solution would be to have a separated openssl archive with
all the nonfree parts in it, so that we would have a completely free
openssl base package with a nonfree addon. GnuPG uses the same method.
What do you think about that?
Christoph Martin
Package: libssl09
Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I got now answer on this problem report.
Has anyone a hint?
Christoph
>
> I suppose we have a problem with the openssl library.
>
> telnet-ssl comes from netkit-telnet, which itself does not show the
> problems. telne
Hi,
I suppose we have a problem with the openssl library.
telnet-ssl comes from netkit-telnet, which itself does not show the
problems. telnet-ssl has the patches from the former SSLtelnet
included. I have reproduced the problem with openssl 0.9.3a and
0.9.4.
You can get the sources from nonus
Ulf Möller writes:
> >I adapted the sharelib patch for ssleay to openssl-0.9.2b. It is using
> >libtool. The patch is for linux, but you can easily adapt it for other
> >architectures. Just change the appropriate lines in Configure.
>
> >+# This program is free software; you can redistribute
Brad Asztalos writes:
> Christoph can you repost the patches you sent to
> open-ssl to build shared libraries under unix?
>
I did it for debian-i386.
Also I had to change the handling of -o option in libtool:
406,408c407,411
< $echo "$modename: you cannot specify the output filename wi
imal changes to some makefiles. I got it working for Debian Linux
and sent the patches to the list some weeks ago.
Christoph
--
========
Christoph Martin, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--expo
emmychen writes:
> >While packaging ssleay for Debian Linux, I did some patches to the
> >Makefiles to have shared library support using libtool. The patches
> >should be fairly generic, so it should work on most plattforms. If
> >you are interested in it, I can send them out to the list. It s
Hi
While packaging ssleay for Debian Linux, I did some patches to the
Makefiles to have shared library support using libtool. The patches
should be fairly generic, so it should work on most plattforms. If
you are interested in it, I can send them out to the list. It supports
static and shared li
55 matches
Mail list logo
