Re: [openssl.org #2650] major ssl read/ write performance improvement - updated

2011-12-09 Thread Deng Michael
allocation and deallocation routines in my setup are not very good. in system with no OS I think the timing is more indicative of software efficiency. for my setup the unknown is the memory arena malloc / free calls. - Original Message - From: Deng Michael To: "openssl-dev@openss

Re: [openssl.org #2650] major ssl read/ write performance improvement - updated

2011-12-09 Thread Deng Michael
, the smaller the record the larger the percentage of saving since the saving is fixed. - Original Message - From: Deng Michael To: "openssl-dev@openssl.org" Cc: Sent: Friday, December 9, 2011 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [openssl.org #2650] major ssl read/ write performance improvement

Re: [openssl.org #2650] major ssl read/ write performance improvement - updated

2011-12-09 Thread Deng Michael
, and it is possible it is due to these limitations. In any case, I guess comunity will be grateful if your share your expirience. WBR, Andrey On 5 December 2011 14:33, Deng Michael via RT wrote: > Hi, >  I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both >

[openssl.org #2650] major ssl read/ write performance improvement - updated

2011-12-05 Thread Deng Michael via RT
Hi,  I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read and write (not handshake)  The saving is fairly major, on cpu with cryto acceleration, the change can more than double the overall ssl read /write speed for 1K record excluding OS IO time. this implies the change

major ssl read/ write performance improvement - updated

2011-12-04 Thread Deng Michael
Hi,  I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read and write (not handshake)  The saving is fairly major, on cpu with cryto acceleration, the change can more than double the overall ssl read /write speed for 1K record excluding OS IO time. this implies the change

Re: major ssl read/ write performance improvement

2011-12-03 Thread Deng Michael
t  -tls1 -www -accept 443  -state -cert botcert.cer  -key botkey.p8 -cipher "aGOST01" 5. Run s_client ./apps/openssl s_client -tls1 -connect 192.168.10.103:443 -msg Well Here s_client will crash with segfault... But if you'll connect via browser - s_server will crash. Please

Re: major ssl read/ write performance improvement

2011-12-03 Thread Deng Michael
n s_server ./apps/openssl s_server  -engine gost  -tls1 -www -accept 443  -state -cert botcert.cer  -key botkey.p8 -cipher "aGOST01" 5. Run s_client ./apps/openssl s_client -tls1 -connect 192.168.10.103:443 -msg Well Here s_client will crash with segfault... But if you'll connect via

Re: major ssl read/ write performance improvement

2011-11-29 Thread Deng Michael
ephen Henson To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:21 PM Subject: Re: major ssl read/ write performance improvement On Mon, Nov 28, 2011, Deng Michael wrote: > Hi, > > I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read > and wri

major ssl read/ write performance improvement

2011-11-28 Thread Deng Michael
Hi, I have changed the mac code which gives substantial improvement for both read and write (not handshake) The saving is fairly major, on cpu with cryto acceleration, the change can more than double the overall ssl read /write speed for 1K record excluding OS IO time. this implies the change