On 2005-06-09 19:54:13 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:28:27 +, Eduardo
Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
eperez On 2005-05-14 15:27:26 +, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
eperez I was wondering if openssl-0.9.8 is going to be API/ABI
On 2005-06-09 13:59:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:37 pm, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
Do you know if there are more people interested in keeping API/ABI
compatible?
you're overlooking the fact that the soname is set to the full version of the
library ... when you go
On 2005-05-14 15:27:26 +, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
I was wondering if openssl-0.9.8 is going to be API/ABI compatible
with the current stable branch of openssl-0.9.7
I think keeping API/ABI compatible is a good idea and makes programmer
and users life easier.
Anyway, if you are not going
On 2005-06-09 11:24:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2005 10:28 am, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
On 2005-05-14 15:27:26 +, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
I was wondering if openssl-0.9.8 is going to be API/ABI compatible
with the current stable branch of openssl-0.9.7
I think
I was wondering if openssl-0.9.8 is going to be API/ABI compatible
with the current stable branch of openssl-0.9.7
I think keeping API/ABI compatible is a good idea and makes programmer
and users life easier.
Anyway, if you are not going to keep API/ABI compatibility in
openssl-0.9.8 with 0.9.7
On 2005-03-04 07:05:01 -0800, Prashant Kumar wrote:
Does OpenSSL has plans to support DTLS ? Is there any good open source
prototype implementation?
In:
http://www.sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/
there's the DTLS implementation:
http://scm.sipfoundry.org/viewsvn/resiprocate/main/sip/contrib/dtls/
This patch seems to have introduced some code duplication:
It seems harmless, but still.
I tried to look line by line of the patch but I may have left something.
On 2004-12-05 02:04:45 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
--- openssl/crypto/asn1/a_bitstr.c 12 Nov 2002 13:21:19 -
