On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:05:51PM +0100, Gabriel Forté wrote:
> > but looking at the code again I think it really should be
> > "if (data->state != BIO_CONN_S_OK)" as conn_state() does nothing
> > if the BIO is already in the BIO_CONN_S_OK state.
huh-oh! I just r
that, but when I do a connect(2) call on
unix sockets, I like to have my socket right now, not just after the
first read() or write() :P
IMHO, the negation in your commit should be removed, and the if statement
(which looks like it's been some "miraculously-working" typo since a
few y
t;) and the nature of the bug makes me
worry that no or little testing was done before commiting.
it would be nice to provide some feedback about that since it causes a
serious functional regression when using BIO_s_connect (at least in my
case).
cheers,
--
Gabriel Forté <[EMAIL
