Re: bug: Win32 generation with debug option

2000-02-18 Thread Gleb Esman
Could anyone please let me know where I could get 0.9.5 from? Thanks, -- Gleb Esman >On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 06:48:36PM -0500, Richard Dykiel wrote: > > > Error in bn_div.c: > > #if defined(BN_LLONG) && defined(BN_DIV2W) && !defined(bn_div_words) > >

Re: SSLeay-0.6.4 is not thread safe?

2000-02-17 Thread Gleb Esman
Richard (and others), Here goes cut-down version of my program, that still fails. Let me know what did i do wrong and what i maybe missing. It shows only SSL-related calls, I deleted all error checking and unrelated stuff. Program does the following: - main() spawns 200 threads. - each threads con

Re: SSLeay-0.6.4 is not thread safe?

2000-02-17 Thread Gleb Esman
Richard, thanks. I want to play more with locking callbacks and I'll let everyone know how it goes. I hope it will help, if not - I'll try to come up with small demo test code. -- Gleb Esman >From: Gleb Esman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >gesman> >Gleb Esman wrote: &g

Re: SSLeay-0.6.4 is not thread safe?

2000-02-16 Thread Gleb Esman
>Gleb Esman wrote: > > > > Sorry I was typing with my head upside-down. > > I am using OpenSSL 0.9.4. > > > > Where the one could get 0.9.5 from? > > > > Anyone here actually uses OpenSSL for multithreaded apps? > > > > When i saw so man

Re: SSLeay-0.6.4 is not thread safe?

2000-02-16 Thread Gleb Esman
Sorry I was typing with my head upside-down. I am using OpenSSL 0.9.4. Where the one could get 0.9.5 from? Anyone here actually uses OpenSSL for multithreaded apps? When i saw so many global variables in use in SSL sources, my hope for real multithreading of SSL is quickly depleting. -- Gleb

SSLeay-0.6.4 is not thread safe?

2000-02-15 Thread Gleb Esman
hes as SSL does. I use NT 4.0 server, SP6a. -- Gleb Esman __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated Li