ns that handle encryption or signing would also be great.
I am looking for the smallest libcrypt possible.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Grant Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project
On 10/20/06, Grant Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, sorry for posting to -users and -dev. I'm not sure which is
more appropriate.
I'm working on an embedded system with no operating system and am only
interested in signature verification. I've looked at the confi
On 10/23/06, Rodney Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try libtomcrypt ;-)
Original Message
Subject: Minimal configuration
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:58:15 -0700
From: Grant Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Firs
On 10/23/06, Grant Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/23/06, Rodney Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> try libtomcrypt ;-)
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Minimal configuration
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:58:15 -0700
> From: Grant Mills
On 10/23/06, Dr. Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006, Grant Mills wrote:
> >Rodney,
> > Thanks. However, I did forget to mention that I need to support
> >the PKCS #7 message structure. But I'll keep libtomcrypt in mind for
> >
On 10/23/06, Grant Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/23/06, Dr. Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006, Grant Mills wrote:
>
> > >Rodney,
> > > Thanks. However, I did forget to mention that I need to support
> > >
might depend on the digest in the signature. However, I don't
perceive those details as being insurmountable.
Any help and thoughts on pitfalls to watch for will be
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Grant Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
