Re: Test of disabled renegotiation in 0.9.8l

2009-11-19 Thread joshi chandran
ssl.org >> Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org >> Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org >> > __ > OpenSSL Project          

Re: Test of disabled renegotiation in 0.9.8l

2009-11-18 Thread joshi chandran
it as Many customer is waiting for this fix . Thanks In Advance Joshi On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM, wrote: > Quoting joshi chandran : > >> Hi ALL, >> >> I have Applied this patch   http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18791 >> on openssl 9.8k . when i have tried re

Re: Test of disabled renegotiation in 0.9.8l

2009-11-17 Thread joshi chandran
g >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Test-of-disabled-renegotiation-in-0.9.8l-tp26301719p26385119.html > Sent from the OpenSSL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > __ > OpenSSL Pr

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release

2009-11-12 Thread joshi chandran
d it, > then that argument might carry a little more weight.  (Call me a > whiner.) > > > >   Steven M. Schweda               s...@antinode-info >   382 South Warwick Street        (+1) 651-699-9818 >   Saint Paul  MN  55105-25

Re: [openssl.org #2068] OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT

2009-10-01 Thread joshi chandran
on ? If this session ticket extension is send by client and server does not handle this extension, will the handshake fails? Thanks in advance On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009, joshi chandran wrote: > >> Hi Stephen, >> >> I ha

Re: [openssl.org #2068] OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT

2009-10-01 Thread joshi chandran
ect core developer. > Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org > > ______ > OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List          

Re: changes between 0.9.8g and 0.9.8j

2009-05-27 Thread joshi chandran
can use something like this to do that: > #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT > SSL_CTX_set_options(ctx, SSL_OP_NO_TICKET); > #endif > > -Brad > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Develop

Re: fipsld or libcrypto.so

2009-05-08 Thread joshi chandran
be 'As a convenience to users, the "fips" option of > FIPS compatible versions of OpenSSSL...". > > The "fipsdso"option is a special purpose feature intended for use with > "private label" binary validations. I should note that it does not work > for all platforms. > > -Steve M. > > > -- > Steve Marquess > Veridical Systems, Inc. > marqu...@veridicalsystems.com > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > -- Regards Joshi Chandran

Re: [openssl.org #1822] Issues w/ fips Makefile

2009-01-27 Thread joshi chandran
> Roumen > > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > -- Regards Joshi Chandran

Re: OpenSSL FIPS 140-2 validation

2008-11-25 Thread joshi chandran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008, joshi chandran wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > I have a different requirement . I want to release openssl 0.9.8j has > normal > > openssl release . i donot want to release fips capable openssl . if i > remove > >

Re: OpenSSL FIPS 140-2 validation

2008-11-19 Thread joshi chandran
page: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Regards Joshi Chandran

Re: [openssl.org #1725] OpenSSL-0.9.8h: Bug in Certificate Request generation

2008-11-02 Thread joshi chandran
d > > in the 0.9.8 snapshots and will appear in the next OpenSSL release. Ok, I > > was > > satisfied with you response and I am waiting for the next stable version of > > > OpenSSL. But, until the next version arrive, the OpenSSL-0.9.8g is working > > fine for me... > > > > Excuse-me, but I didn't understand what you are asking me now? I didn't > > hope > > you returned to that subject. > > > > > Regards, > > Rafael > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Steve > > > > -- > > Atenciosamente, > > Rafael Jorge Csura Szendrodi > > >Network Administrator - PADS/COPPE/UFRJ > > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 2008/9/8 Steve Pincaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Hi, >> >> I have seen the issue will be fixed in the next >> release<http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg24330.html>, >> do you have an ETA ? (0.9.8i or 0.9.9 ?) , I would then ask Apache team when >> such new OpenSSL milestone would be bundled in Apache2 HTTPd (2.3 ?!) >> >> Regards, >> >> Steve >> >> >> > > > > -- Regards Joshi Chandran

Re: [openssl.org #1725] OpenSSL-0.9.8h: Bug in Certificate Request generation

2008-11-01 Thread joshi chandran
d > > in the 0.9.8 snapshots and will appear in the next OpenSSL release. Ok, I > > was > > satisfied with you response and I am waiting for the next stable version of > > > OpenSSL. But, until the next version arrive, the OpenSSL-0.9.8g is working > > fine for me... > > > > Excuse-me, but I didn't understand what you are asking me now? I didn't > > hope > > you returned to that subject. > > > > > Regards, > > Rafael > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Steve > > > > -- > > Atenciosamente, > > Rafael Jorge Csura Szendrodi > > >Network Administrator - PADS/COPPE/UFRJ > > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 2008/9/8 Steve Pincaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Hi, >> >> I have seen the issue will be fixed in the next >> release<http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg24330.html>, >> do you have an ETA ? (0.9.8i or 0.9.9 ?) , I would then ask Apache team when >> such new OpenSSL milestone would be bundled in Apache2 HTTPd (2.3 ?!) >> >> Regards, >> >> Steve >> >> >> > > > > -- Regards Joshi Chandran

Question regarding openssl fips module

2008-08-26 Thread Joshi Chandran
Is it possible to build 64 bit of openssl fips module .please reply it is urgent Thanks Joshi Chandran

Build Issue in Openssl FIPS

2008-08-14 Thread joshi chandran
e. 3. make install - this command is failing .It is showing some file missing can u please tell me the compliation script . -- Regards Joshi Chandran