OpenSSL/Java JSSE Handshake problem...

r be fixed? Also, who is doing the correct thing here, JSSE or OpenSSL? Sincerely, Kevin Regan Kevin Regan Technical Lead Houston UNIX Team Office: 2200 Phone: 713-548-1767 __ OpenSSL Project

Re: OpenSSL/Java JSSE Handshake problem...

EAD: SSL v3.1 Application Data, length = 21 Plaintext after DECRYPTION: len = 21 : 6C FF C7 5B 71 3F 71 BF 02 1A 64 DF F4 6D AC A3 l..[q?q...d..m.. 0010: 93 43 00 73 1C .C.s. main, READ: SSL v3.1 Application Data, length = 21 Plaintext after DECRYPTI

"./config" problem with GCC 3.1 and OpenSSL 0.9.6d

ions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. As a workaround, I changed the above line to: GCCVER=3.1 --Kevin Kevin Regan NetIQ Corporation (www.netiq.com) Technical Lead Houston UNIX Team Office: 2200 P

Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

to have someone on the openssl team look at each RAND_add() call and determine if any additional memsets are needed with the "PURIFY" flag (with an eye towards structures that may not be fully initialized). Sincerely, Kevin Regan F5 Networks

RE: Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

>> You're missing the point -- your comment is the height of irony, in a >> way. >> >> Use a suppression to make Valgrind shut up. >> >> /r$ > > I think you misunderstand his issue. His issue is not "valgrind reports a > spurious error/warning". His issue is "-DPURIFY does not do what I thi

RE: RE: Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

. --Kevin From: Kevin Regan Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 10:53 AM To: 'openssl-dev@openssl.org' Subject: RE: Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds. >> You're missing the point -- your comment is the height of irony, in a >> way. >> >> Use a suppression

[PATCH] Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

mp;sb,sizeof(sb),0.0); if (bytes == 0) return(ret); From: Kevin Regan Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 11:01 AM To: Kevin Regan; 'openssl-dev@openssl.org' Subject: RE: RE: Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds. I also wanted to mention that the -DPURIFY flag should not weake

RE: [PATCH] Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:35 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds. On Mon, Jan 11, 2010, Kevin Regan wrote: > Any further thoughts on this patch? I'd love to get these -DPURIFY builds > working properly. > Plea

RE: [openssl.org #2138] Resolved: [PATCH] Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

"-DPURIFY" builds. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010, Kevin Regan via RT wrote: > Is there somewhere that I can check to verify this? I want to make sure that > this patch is in the latest build. > You can either wait until tomorrow snapshots or pull the latest CVS using the in

[openssl.org #2138] [PATCH] Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

This patch fixes a bug with the -DPURIFY flag. The stat structure contains padding and unused fields that are not initialized with the stat call. This causes applications such as Valgrind to be unable to analyze OpenSSL executables that are compiled with the -DPURIFY flag. This is for OpenSSL

RE: [openssl.org #2138] Resolved: [PATCH] Change needed for "-DPURIFY" builds.

Is there somewhere that I can check to verify this? I want to make sure that this patch is in the latest build. Thanks, Kevin -Original Message- From: Stephen Henson via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 10:09 AM To: Kevin Regan Subject