Del Vecchio
Subject: Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
Hi Martin,
Comments inline.
On October 28, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
Yes, there are two different libubsec.so libraries:
1) The one built in OpenSSL with ./config shared; this
is the stub library
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: Martin Del Vecchio
Subject: Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
On October 27, 2005 02:47 pm, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
I get an error similar to what I was seeing before; it can't find the
symbol
'ubsec_bytes_to_bits':
error:2506406A:DSO support
PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: Martin Del Vecchio
Subject: Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
On October 25, 2005 11:06 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
I'm still looking for help with this problem.
The uBSec support works in 0.9.7g with static linking.
The uBSec support works
| grep bytes
4904 b p_UBSEC_ubsec_bits_to_bytes
48fc b p_UBSEC_ubsec_bytes_to_bits
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Del Vecchio
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:34 PM
To: Geoff Thorpe; openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE
.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Del Vecchio
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:42 AM
To: 'openssl-dev@openssl.org'
Subject: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
I am using OpenSSL on Linux in a shared library environment (./config
shared).
I am trying to load support
I am using OpenSSL on Linux in a shared library environment (./config
shared).
I am trying to load support for the Broadcom uBSec engine. Here is a
test program:
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{ ENGINE *Engine;
SSL_library_init();
SSL_load_error_strings();
Title: Padding in SSL3_RT_MAX_ENCRYPTED_LENGTH excessive?
In ssl\ssl3.h, SSL3_RT_MAX_ENCRYPTED_LENGTH is defined as:
#define SSL3_RT_MAX_ENCRYPTED_LENGTH (1024+SSL3_RT_MAX_COMPRESSED_LENGTH)
I assume that this padding is there to handle the padding performed by various encryption
Title: Re: SSL per session memory usage
Prashant Kumar wrote:
Hello Goetz,
Thank you for your input. I tested re-negotiation and it works fine with this change \
since while doing re-negotiate the OpenSsl returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ or \
SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE in which case I will not
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marton
AnkaSent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:08 PMTo:
openssl-users@openssl.orgSubject: Re: Reducing SSL3 Buffer
Requirements
On 9/22/05, Martin Del
Vecchio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
the transmit side, OpenSSL currently has the ability to sendarbitrarily
la
