Re: Re: [openssl.org #1485] [PATCH] Type Punning fix for 0.9.7f+ and all 0.9.8 o

Andy - These fixes look great and solve the underlying problem we encountered with x_name.c and assumed byte-ordering. We will re-test with these fixes and get back to you, but for now please consider this case closed (and fixed). Thanks, Mike Michael Kobar [EMAIL

[openssl.org #1485] [PATCH] Type Punning fix for 0.9.7f+ and all 0.9.8 on Big Endien 64 bit machines

to the US Bureau of Industry and Security and the Encryption Request Coordinator. Thanks in advance, Mike Michael Kobar Senior Software Engineer Lymeware Corporation www.lymeware.com x_name.c.patch097 Description: Binary data x_name.c.patch098 Description: Binary data

[openssl.org #1486] [Patch] new ppc64 and s390x Configure entries for 0.9.7 tree

::dlfcn:linux-shared:-fPIC::.so.\$(SHLIB_MAJOR).\$(SHLIB_MINOR), Since I am in the US, I have already submitted this code to the US Bureau of Industry and Security and the Encryption Request Coordinator. Thanks, Mike Michael Kobar Senior Software Engineer Lymeware Corporation

[openssl.org #1488] [Patch] new ppc64 and s390x Configure entries for 0.9.8 tree

).\$(SHLIB_MINOR), Since I am in the US, I have already submitted this code to the US Bureau of Industry and Security and the Encryption Request Coordinator. Thanks, Mike Michael Kobar Senior Software Engineer Lymeware Corporation www.lymeware.com config098d.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6d beta 1 testing results

--- Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:21:30 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.6d beta 1 testing results Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:36:47PM -0400, Michael Kobar wrote

OpenSSL 0.9.6d beta 1 testing results

7.1 linux-elf Both OK Cygwin 1.3.10-1cygwinBoth FAILED The cygwin failures were sent to the list earlier today. Thanks, Mike Michael Kobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer 860.434.4018 Lymeware Corporation

Bug in 0.9.6d-beta1 on Cygwin

`/cygdrive/e/src/openssl-0.9.6d-beta1/crypto' make: *** [sub_all] Error 1 I have attached the entire make output log. Thanks, Mike Michael Kobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer 860.434.4018 Lymeware Corporation801.383.9021 fax

Another bug in 0.9.6d-beta1 on Cygwin? Or is it just me?

, Mike Michael Kobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer 860.434.4018 Lymeware Corporation801.383.9021 fax www.lymeware.com make.out2 Description: Binary data

[PATCH] Fixes for CygWin32 obj_dat.h generation for 0.9.6-stable

against the 03 January 2002 0.9.6-stable snapshot, and have been tested on WinNT 4.0 x86 (with Cygwin), RedHat 6.2 7.1 x86 and SPARC Solaris 2.6 7 with success. Michael Kobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer 860.434.4018 voice Lymeware Corporation

[PATCH] Fixes for CygWin32 config and test support for 0.9.6-stable

to the Configure perl script. All diffs were made with diff -Naur format against the 05 December 0.9.6-stable snapshot, and have been tested on WinNT 4.0 x86 (with Cygwin), RedHat 6.2 7.1 x86 and SPARC Solaris 2.6 7 with success. Michael Kobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software

[PATCH] Fixes for CygWin32 config and test support for 0.9.7-dev

arguments to the Configure perl script. All diffs were made with diff -Naur format against the 05 December 0.9.7-dev snapshot, and have been tested on WinNT 4.0 x86 (with Cygwin), RedHat 6.2 7.1 x86 and SPARC Solaris 2.6 7 with success. Michael Kobar [EMAIL PROTECTED

CipherSpecs: How to force one I don't see?

equivalent of SSL_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA or 0x0009. What is the equivalent OpenSSL cipher list? How can I add it to the available list if it is currently not supported? Any and all help would be gratefully accepted. Thanks in advance, Mike -- Michael Kobar[EMAIL