Hi Rich,
>> Just go ahead a file a pull request anyway...that's the best way of getting
>> comments. If changes are needed you can update the PR as required.
>
> Like, for example, documenting this new function. :)
Sure, I did mention it alongside its get0 counterpart in
doc/man3/OCSP_resp_find_
Mon, 7 Nov 2016 12:54:03 -0600
>> From: Benjamin Kaduk
>> Reply-To:openssl-us...@openssl.org
>> To: openssl-us...@openssl.org
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 05:42 AM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
openssl.org
On 11/07/2016 05:42 AM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering how to properly make a clone of a const X509_NAME in
> OpenSSL 1.1?
>
> In particular, I am obtaining a const X509_NAME* via OCSP_resp_get0_id()
> and would like to pass it to X509_fi
