i stand corrected about -mno-cygwin, it does seem great and i can
understand why one would want not letting go of it.
it's hard to find info about it on cygwin.com, but searching through
their mailing list archives, there are tons of messages evocating it.
some dating from year 2000 were
On 27/11/10 6:32, dkauf...@rahul.net via RT wrote:
The last proposed change would break the build for mingw done under
cygwin, since the -mno-cygwin flag is critical there. The only place
I see where OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 is used is to define MS_STATIC.
MS_STATIC is used in 20 places in the
hello,
i am reporting a bug with regards to a missing flag in MinGW targets.
the bug is present in both 0.9 and 1.0 branches; it is (in our case)
only leading to crashes in 1.0.
the missing flag is: OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32
it is always defined for MSVC targets, but MinGW ones are forgetting to
