In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:42:51 +0200, Matthias
Loepfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Matthias.Loepfe I just want to give you some background information
Matthias.Loepfe why AdNovum has choosen the let's call it the
Matthias.Loepfe 'interceptor-way' of implementing the
Geoff Thorpe schrieb:
(b) any/all access information (eg. control commands, authorisation
data, the ENGINE id if necessary, etc) that you *want* to include
in the key file should not go into the raw PEM format itself but
instead should be embedded in the per-'nid' data
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002, Matthias Loepfe wrote:
Hi
I just want to give you some background information why AdNovum has
choosen the let's call it the 'interceptor-way' of implementing
the PKCS#11 functionality.
We are working in an environment where the main purpose of the
hardware
Matthias Loepfe wrote:
Hi
I just want to give you some background information why AdNovum has
choosen the let's call it the 'interceptor-way' of implementing
the PKCS#11 functionality.
We are working in an environment where the main purpose of the
hardware security modules (HSM) is not
