Re: [PATCH] RPM spec file change for 0.9.6a

2001-04-01 Thread JJohnson
This is already fixed, it was due to the file being installed via cp in the Makefile without preservation. Creating symlinks instead of installing it properly is a kludge. -miah On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 06:35:49PM +0100, Tim Small wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a patch to the spec file from beta2, th

[PATCH] RPM spec file change for 0.9.6a

2001-03-29 Thread Tim Small
Hi, Here's a patch to the spec file from beta2, this fixes a build-time problem on my Redhat 6.2 (+updates) systems (and probably other versions as well) which results in /usr/lib/libssl.so, and /usr/lib/libssl.so.x being copies of /usr/lib/libssl.so.x.y.z instead of symbolic links. The patc