I haven't witnessed any problems like you describe, so maybe the OS I
am using is well behaved.
maybe is not acceptable answer:-) What is it? I *assumed* it was
Linux, but gcc -dumpspecs predefines __CELLOS_LV2__ which doesn't sound
like Linux... The macro doesn't seem to be present in stock
Oops. Should have replied to r...@openssl.org. Sorry about duplicate. A.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #1998] [PATCH] SHA512 ROTR macro fix for
PowerPC using LP32 model
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:57:58 +0200
From: Andy Polyakov ap...@fy.chalmers.se
Reply-To: openssl
Hi,
I am new to the list, so apologies if I fail to follow any of the ground
rules.
I just ran into a bug where SHA384/512 were not being calculated
correctly on the Cell processor. I tracked it down to the definition of
the ROTR macro, which is assuming a 64 bit long, but in this case the
Hi,
I am new to the list, so apologies if I fail to follow any of the ground
rules.
I just ran into a bug where SHA384/512 were not being calculated
correctly on the Cell processor. I tracked it down to the definition of
the ROTR macro, which is assuming a 64 bit long, but in this case the
Don't worry 'bout it too much.
Could you please create that as a .diff file and attach it to an email
to r...@openssl.org? The rt system creates a case that can be tracked.
-Kyle H
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ben Nasonbna...@netflix.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to the list, so apologies if
