[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2016-02-02 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Sorry we didn't get to this sooner. We're only taking security fixes for 1.0.1 now. Please open a new ticket if this is still an issue with current releases. VMS gets a major uplift in 1.1 -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org ___ openssl-de

Re: [openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-11 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014, Zoltan Arpadffy wrote: > Thank you Steve. > > I keep in mind: > - use gnu diff > - send patch as attachment. > Could you please resend the original patches as attachements? Thanks, Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now

Re: [openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-10 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014, Zoltan Arpadffy wrote: > SYSTEM@ia64$ mc dka0:gdiff.exe -u [.ssl]ssl-lib.com;1 > [.ssl]ssl-lib.com;4 > --- [.ssl]ssl-lib.com;1 Mon Jan 6 16:00:58 2014 > +++ [.ssl]ssl-lib.com;4 Mon Jan 6 22:03:46 2014 > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ > $! Define The Different SSL "library" Files. >

RE: [openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-10 Thread Zoltan Arpadffy
ms_cd,cms_env,cms_enc,cms_ess,"+ - - "cms_pwri" + "cms_pwri,cms_kari" $ LIB_PQUEUE = "pqueue" $ LIB_TS = "ts_err,ts_req_utils,ts_req_print,ts_rsp_utils,ts_rsp_print,"+ - "ts_rsp_sign,ts_rsp_verify,ts_verify_ctx,ts_lib,ts_conf,

[openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-10 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: "Stephen Henson via RT" > Thanks for the report. Is there some way you can generate diff files in a= > more > standard form? [...] Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:05:10 -0500 (CDT) From: sms@antinode-info (Steven M. Schweda) Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS > [...] >You migh

[openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-10 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
On Tue Jan 07 09:26:35 2014, z...@polarhome.com wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for releasing 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f. > I tested them right away (that I haven't done for more than a year) found > that there are needed some changes in order to make the it work under > OpenVMS. > Thanks for the report. Is

[openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-07 Thread Zoltan Arpadffy via RT
Hello, Thank you for releasing 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f. I tested them right away (that I haven't done for more than a year) found that there are needed some changes in order to make the it work under OpenVMS. 1. I have tested for the very first time with HP C V7.3-020 on OpenVMS IA64 V8.4 and found

[PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-06 Thread Zoltan Arpadffy
Hello, Thank you for releasing 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f. I tested them right away (that I haven't done for more than a year) found that there are needed some changes in order to make the it work under OpenVMS. 1. I have tested for the very first time with HP C V7.3-020 on OpenVMS IA64 V8.4 and f