Re: [openssl-dev] (future) STORE vs X509_LOOKUP_METHOD by_dir

2017-02-08 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <589b86c1.10...@roumenpetrov.info> on Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:59:45 +0200, Roumen Petrov said: openssl> Hi Richard, openssl> openssl> Richard Levitte wrote: openssl> > Hi, openssl> > openssl> > I've some ponderings that I need to bounce a bit with you all. openssl> > openssl> > Some have

Re: [openssl-dev] (future) STORE vs X509_LOOKUP_METHOD by_dir

2017-02-08 Thread Roumen Petrov
Hi Richard, Richard Levitte wrote: Hi, I've some ponderings that I need to bounce a bit with you all. Some have talked about replace the X509_LOOKUP_METHOD X.509 lookup method could return certificate , revocation list or EVP_KEY (structure x509_object_st). Unfortunately functionality of

Re: [openssl-dev] (future) STORE vs X509_LOOKUP_METHOD by_dir

2017-02-06 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Sun, 2017-02-05 at 16:47 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > Hi, > > I've some ponderings that I need to bounce a bit with you all. > > Some have talked about replace the X509_LOOKUP_METHOD bit with the > STORE module I'm building, and while STORE isn't ready for it yet, I > have some thoughts on

[openssl-dev] (future) STORE vs X509_LOOKUP_METHOD by_dir

2017-02-05 Thread Richard Levitte
Hi, I've some ponderings that I need to bounce a bit with you all. Some have talked about replace the X509_LOOKUP_METHOD bit with the STORE module I'm building, and while STORE isn't ready for it yet, I have some thoughts on how the two can approach each other. This would involve one or two hook