Yes, this is intentional. See also the issuer_hash_old and subject_hash_old
options in the x509 utility:
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/apps/x509.html
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-d
Hi,
The return value of X509_NAME_hash() has changed from 0.9.8zb onwards.
I have written a sample program to verify the value return of X509_NAME_hash().
I linked the same program with four different version of crypto library. The
output is as below:
==
