[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

The warnings are annoying but harmless. running 'make depend' is required. Closing ticket. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4169 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

Hi, I'll answer to the original report... there's a lot of confusion going on here... Vid Sun, 06 Dec 2015 kl. 22.48.57, skrev pgnet@gmail.com: > Building openssl-1.0.2e from src > > wget http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2e.tar.gz > tar zxvf openssl-1.0.2e.tar.gz > cd openssl-1.0.2e

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

BTW, there's something very suspicious about make clean; make _not_ working, when (presumably) make clean; make depend; make does work. On 14 March 2016 at 21:03, Ben Laurie wrote: > On 14 March 2016 at 20:31, Salz, Rich wrote: >>> In particular, how do you

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> Is there some good reason to not fix make depend? It should also be warning > free. No, it should be fixed. Especially since 1.0.2 is an LTS release (for TLS, henh). But ignoring it's errors is okay until then. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

On 14 March 2016 at 20:31, Salz, Rich wrote: >> In particular, how do you know there is not one important warning hiding >> among the thousands of others? > > We're talking "make depend" Is there some good reason to not fix make depend? It should also be warning free. > Not

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> In particular, how do you know there is not one important warning hiding > among the thousands of others? We're talking "make depend" Not compiling. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

On 03/14/2016 12:53 PM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote: >> In order build openssl 1.0.2g >> >> use `make depend` when prompted -- i.e., do NOT ignore the advice >> but DO ignore the 1000's of lines of output, and just proceed to >> subsequent `make` >> >> And that resultant build is

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> In order build openssl 1.0.2g > > use `make depend` when prompted -- i.e., do NOT ignore the advice > but DO ignore the 1000's of lines of output, and just proceed to > subsequent `make` > > And that resultant build is considered a reliable build. > > Is that correct? Yes. --

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

On 03/14/2016 12:41 PM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote: >> 'make clean', without 'make depend' does NOT build. >> >> using 'make depend' BUILDS, but not without 1000's of lines of 'warnings'. > > Ignore them. 'make depend' attempts to optimize dependencies so that only > what's needed is built. In

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> We're obviously not communicating. No, sorry. > 'make clean', without 'make depend' does NOT build. > > using 'make depend' BUILDS, but not without 1000's of lines of 'warnings'. Ignore them. 'make depend' attempts to optimize dependencies so that only what's needed is built. In this

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> We're obviously not communicating. No, sorry. > 'make clean', without 'make depend' does NOT build. > > using 'make depend' BUILDS, but not without 1000's of lines of 'warnings'. Ignore them. 'make depend' attempts to optimize dependencies so that only what's needed is built. In this

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

On 03/14/2016 12:34 PM, Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > >> Here, atm, I've no working path to a 'clean' (warning/error-free) build. > > Yes, 'make clean' is just as good as 'make depend' > We're obviously not communicating. 'make clean', without 'make depend' does NOT build. using 'make depend'

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> Here, atm, I've no working path to a 'clean' (warning/error-free) build. Yes, 'make clean' is just as good as 'make depend' -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4169 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

> Here, atm, I've no working path to a 'clean' (warning/error-free) build. Yes, 'make clean' is just as good as 'make depend' -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

On 03/14/2016 11:25 AM, Rich Salz via RT wrote: > Okay, the focus on this ticket is now to update the configure script output. > :) > As previously described here, you can ignore the recommendation to run make > depend. Not quite ... currently, without `make depend` make clean

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

Okay, the focus on this ticket is now to update the configure script output. :) As previously described here, you can ignore the recommendation to run make depend. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4169 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted --

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4169] openssl-1.0.2e build still recommends deprecated (unnecessary?) `make depend`, returns numerous warnings abt not finding stddef.h

fixed in 1.1 -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4169 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev