Hello all,
There is a minor issue with X509_STORE_CTX_init and its usage. Most of the
callers of X509_STORE_CTX_init use a stack variable and pass its address as the
ctx argument to this function. However, X509_STORE_CTX_init in case of an
error in the call to CRYPTO_new_ex_data does an
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:33:45AM +, Srinivas Koripella via RT wrote:
> There is a minor issue with X509_STORE_CTX_init and its usage. Most of
> the callers of X509_STORE_CTX_init use a stack variable and pass its
> address as the ctx argument to this function. However, X509_STORE_CTX_init
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:53:54AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:33:45AM +, Srinivas Koripella via RT wrote:
>
> > There is a minor issue with X509_STORE_CTX_init and its usage. Most of
> > the callers of X509_STORE_CTX_init use a stack variable and pass its
> >
