Some better comments on pre- and post-conditions would be useful. But the fix
(the second one) has been commit'd Closing ticket.
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4346
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
> There seems to be a bug in the AVX2 codepath in poly1305-x86.pl. I have not
> attempted to debug this, but I have attached a test file which produces
> different output in normal and AVX2 codepaths. Our existing poly1305
> implementation agrees with the former.
>
> $ OPENSSL_ia32cap=0
>> There seems to be a bug in the AVX2 codepath in poly1305-x86.pl. I have not
>> attempted to debug this, but I have attached a test file which produces
>> different output in normal and AVX2 codepaths. Our existing poly1305
>> implementation agrees with the former.
>>
>> $ OPENSSL_ia32cap=0
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:48 PM Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
> > There seems to be a bug in the AVX2 codepath in poly1305-x86.pl. I have
> not
> > attempted to debug this, but I have attached a test file which produces
> > different output in normal and AVX2 codepaths. Our
> There seems to be a bug in the AVX2 codepath in poly1305-x86.pl. I have not
> attempted to debug this, but I have attached a test file which produces
> different output in normal and AVX2 codepaths. Our existing poly1305
> implementation agrees with the former.
>
> $ OPENSSL_ia32cap=0
There seems to be a bug in the AVX2 codepath in poly1305-x86.pl. I have not
attempted to debug this, but I have attached a test file which produces
different output in normal and AVX2 codepaths. Our existing poly1305
implementation agrees with the former.
$ OPENSSL_ia32cap=0 ./poly1305_test
PASS