[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4458] "implicitly declared function" warnings due to missing include

2016-06-01 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
This has been fixed in commit 7233bea263 Closing this ticket. Cheers, Richard On Wed May 25 21:46:01 2016, levitte wrote: > I don't get such warnings. Can you tell me what system and with what > tool chain > (including versions)? > > On Sun Mar 20 13:07:43 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4458] "implicitly declared function" warnings due to missing include

2016-05-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:46:02PM +, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > I don't get such warnings. Can you tell me what system and with what tool > chain > (including versions)? I think that the report is correct, we must be getting away with on most platforms. On NetBSD, for example,

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4458] "implicitly declared function" warnings due to missing include

2016-05-25 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
I don't get such warnings. Can you tell me what system and with what tool chain (including versions)? On Sun Mar 20 13:07:43 2016, noloa...@gmail.com wrote: > The missing include caused a number of "implicitly > declared function" warnings due to use of strcmpcase and strncmpcase. > > $ egrep

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4458] "implicitly declared function" warnings due to missing include

2016-03-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
The missing include caused a number of "implicitly declared function" warnings due to use of strcmpcase and strncmpcase. $ egrep -IR '(strcasecmp|strncasecmp)' * | cut -f 1 -d ':' | sort | uniq apps/apps.c apps/ca.c apps/ocsp.c apps/rehash.c apps/s_server.c crypto/asn1/ameth_lib.c