[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-20 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Thanks for the discussion; closing this ticket. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4570 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-17 Thread Loic Etienne via RT
Your technical arguments are sound, indeed. From: Andy Polyakov via RT <r...@openssl.org> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 5:13:50 PM To: Loic Etienne Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-17 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> 1) Openssl works correctly (no crash, correct detection), as far as I > can judge. By error-prone I mean, very defensively, that I (or > others) could make a mistake, or that future versions of openssl > could not work exactly the same way. Well, this is effectively argument in favour of

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-17 Thread Loic Etienne via RT
sl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes > Run-time checking works for x86, but not for arm (OPENSSL_armcap_P is > hidden, I still have to try over environment variables, which are not > as flexible for arm as for x86

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-17 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> Run-time checking works for x86, but not for arm (OPENSSL_armcap_P is > hidden, I still have to try over environment variables, which are not > as flexible for arm as for x86). > > > Anyway, it would be helpful to exclude hardware aes instructions at > compile-time: > > 1) Runtime checking is

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-17 Thread Loic Etienne via RT
Run-time checking works for x86, but not for arm (OPENSSL_armcap_P is hidden, I still have to try over environment variables, which are not as flexible for arm as for x86). Anyway, it would be helpful to exclude hardware aes instructions at compile-time: 1) Runtime checking is error prone

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-16 Thread Rich Salz via RT
On Tue Jun 14 15:43:26 2016, loic.etie...@qnective.com wrote: > Define a configuration option no-hw-aes. > No aes processor instruction should be compiled if one of the > configuration options no-hw or no-hw-aes is given. Why doesn't existing run-time checking work for you? -- Ticket here:

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4570] Enhancement request: Configuration option no-hw-aes

2016-06-14 Thread Loic Etienne via RT
Define a configuration option no-hw-aes. No aes processor instruction should be compiled if one of the configuration options no-hw or no-hw-aes is given. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4570 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev