On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:37AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> What'll likely happen is that SSL_session_reused() will be the
> new name of the SSL_cache_hit() function, and SSL_cache_hit will
> become a macro referencing that function:
>
>int SSL_session_reused(const SSL *ssl);
>#if
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Short, Todd wrote:
>
> I noticed that:
>
> * SSL_cache_hit(SSL*), and
> * SSL_session_reused(SSL*ssl) -->
> SSL_ctrl(ssl,SSL_CTRL_GET_SESSION_REUSED,0,NULL)
>
> are practically the same thing; both return s->hit.
>
> Are both really needed?
I started a thread
Hi,
I know OpenSSL is making 1.1 not ABI compliant to 1.0, so, maybe now is a good
time to clean this up?
I noticed that:
* SSL_cache_hit(SSL*), and
* SSL_session_reused(SSL*ssl) -->
SSL_ctrl(ssl,SSL_CTRL_GET_SESSION_REUSED,0,NULL)
are practically the same thing; both return s->hit.
Are both
