On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:32PM +, Howard Chu wrote:
> >I[t] must do nothing. That's what auto-initialization is for. It is
> >wrong for libraries to initialize OpenSSL, because that can't be
> >done safely. So in libraries that use OpenSSL, no OpenSSL initialization,
> >and no cleanup.
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 16, 2016, at 11:17 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
If a library (or loadable plugin within an application) uses OpenSSL,
how should it clean up after itself?
I must do nothing. That's what auto-initialization is for. It is
wrong for libraries to initialize OpenSSL
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:17:15PM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
> Maybe EVP_cleanup() and other similar explicit deinit functions should
> be deprecated, and do nothing in 1.1.0? The auto-deinit capability
> should handle it. That way you would not need to do anything "special"
> for 1.1.0 with "#if
On 16/02/16 16:17, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 22:17 +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>
>> Maybe EVP_cleanup() and other similar explicit deinit functions should
>> be deprecated, and do nothing in 1.1.0? The auto-deinit capability
>> should handle it. That way you would not need to
> On Feb 16, 2016, at 11:17 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> If a library (or loadable plugin within an application) uses OpenSSL,
> how should it clean up after itself?
I must do nothing. That's what auto-initialization is for. It is
wrong for libraries to initialize OpenSSL, because that can'
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 22:17 +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> Maybe EVP_cleanup() and other similar explicit deinit functions should
> be deprecated, and do nothing in 1.1.0? The auto-deinit capability
> should handle it. That way you would not need to do anything "special"
> for 1.1.0 with "#ifdef"
On Po, 2016-02-15 at 22:17 +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> On 15/02/16 21:50, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:33PM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
> > > On 15/02/16 21:25, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > > > Is this change in OpenSSL behavior expected? Is it not allowed
> > > > to call
>
On 15/02/16 21:50, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:33PM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
>> On 15/02/16 21:25, Jouni Malinen wrote:
>>> Is this change in OpenSSL behavior expected? Is it not allowed to call
>>> EVP_cleanup() and then re-initialize OpenSSL digests with
>>> SSL_libra
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:33PM +, Matt Caswell wrote:
> On 15/02/16 21:25, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > Is this change in OpenSSL behavior expected? Is it not allowed to call
> > EVP_cleanup() and then re-initialize OpenSSL digests with
> > SSL_library_init()?
>
> Correct, you cannot reinit on
On 15/02/16 21:25, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:52:27PM +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:04:20PM +, OpenSSL wrote:
>>>OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 (alpha)
>
>> It looks like something in pre release 3 has changed behavior in a way
>> t
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:52:27PM +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:04:20PM +, OpenSSL wrote:
> >OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 (alpha)
> It looks like something in pre release 3 has changed behavior in a way
> that results in SSL_CTX_new(SSLv23_method()) faili
On 15/02/16 20:52, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:04:20PM +, OpenSSL wrote:
>>OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 (alpha)
>>
>>OpenSSL 1.1.0 is currently in alpha. OpenSSL 1.1.0 pre release 3 has now
>>been made available. For details of changes and known issues
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:04:20PM +, OpenSSL wrote:
>OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 (alpha)
>
>OpenSSL 1.1.0 is currently in alpha. OpenSSL 1.1.0 pre release 3 has now
>been made available. For details of changes and known issues see the
>release notes at:
>
> ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 (alpha)
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is currently in alpha. OpenSSL 1.1.0 pre release 3 has now
14 matches
Mail list logo
