Returning to the issue at hand:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/851
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:24 PM Erik Forsberg wrote:
> add Solaris to the platforms that are not at beta-level yet.
> Richard Levitte and myself are helping each other out though, so we should
> be close
>
> >-- Origina
add Solaris to the platforms that are not at beta-level yet.
Richard Levitte and myself are helping each other out though, so we should be
close
>-- Original Message --
>
>> noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a
>> few
>> noloader> platforms, including ARM32
> but from my point of view it is really hard to contribute code to OpenSSL.
Things are much better, but it is still harder than we'd like. Hopefully it
will continue to improve.
> I feel really sorry for the authors of PR's that got first review but their
> code won't get into 1.1 because of
On 11 March 2016 at 15:22, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I would like to point out that there are several already reviewed pull
> requests with new features - e.g. [0] and [1] - waiting to be merged. Do
> openssl devs plan to address these before 1.1 freeze?
>
> >[0] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pu
> I would like to point out that there are several already reviewed pull
> requests with new features - e.g. [0] and [1] - waiting to be merged. Do
> openssl devs plan to address these before 1.1 freeze?
>[0] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/576
> [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pu
On 11 March 2016 at 10:21, Matt Caswell wrote:
> I'd argue that a freeze helps us to iron the issues out. Problems tend
> to get introduced when new features are added. By declaring a freeze we
> no longer accept new features and can instead divert our attention to
> stability and bug fixing.
>
On 11 March 2016 at 09:24, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a
>> few
>> noloader> platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition,
>> noloader> there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's
>>
> noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a
> few
> noloader> platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition,
> noloader> there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's
> C7
> noloader> processor on Linux.
> noloader>
> noloa
On 11/03/16 01:03, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a few
> platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition,
> there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's C7
> processor on Linux.
>
>
In message
on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:03:11 -0500, Jeffrey Walton said:
noloader> Hi Everyone,
noloader>
noloader> Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a few
noloader> platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition,
noloader> there seems to be one-off i
Hi Everyone,
Testing master on real hardware is showing some minor issues on a few
platforms, including ARM32, ARM64, PowerPC and i686. In addition,
there seems to be one-off issues on other combinations, like VIA's C7
processor on Linux.
In addition to the base issues, there are other minor issu
11 matches
Mail list logo