Re: [openssl-dev] Proposal for the ASN.1 form of TPM1.2 and TPM2 keys

2016-12-23 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 21:12 +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <1482516363.2501.34.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Fri, > 23 Dec 2016 10:06:03 -0800, James Bottomley < > james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> said: > > James.Bottomley> The reason this comes about is because we already > ha

Re: [openssl-dev] Proposal for the ASN.1 form of TPM1.2 and TPM2 keys

2016-12-23 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <1482516363.2501.34.ca...@hansenpartnership.com> on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:06:03 -0800, James Bottomley said: James.Bottomley> The reason this comes about is because we already have a standard form James.Bottomley> for TPM 1.2 keys here: James.Bottomley> James.Bottomley> http://david.

[openssl-dev] Proposal for the ASN.1 form of TPM1.2 and TPM2 keys

2016-12-23 Thread James Bottomley
The reason this comes about is because we already have a standard form for TPM 1.2 keys here: http://david.woodhou.se/draft-woodhouse-cert-best-practice.html#ident-tpm However, since I'm working on TPM2 enabling for openssl and gnutls, I need to come up with a new key format because TPM2 requires