Andy Polyakov wrote:
>> 1. Please
>> see
>> https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/75b833cc819a9d189adb0fdd56327bee600ff9e9.
>>
>> I think it would be good for OpenSSL to work with Google to integrate
>> this patch.
>
> Will be looked into...
Awesome! Besides the functions that Google ch
> 1. Please
> see
> https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/75b833cc819a9d189adb0fdd56327bee600ff9e9.
>
> I think it would be good for OpenSSL to work with Google to integrate
> this patch.
Will be looked into...
> 2. Is the `__chkstk` code that was added [1] to `bn_mul_mont` really
> ne
1. Please see
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/75b833cc819a9d189adb0fdd56327bee600ff9e9
.
I think it would be good for OpenSSL to work with Google to integrate this
patch.
2. Is the `__chkstk` code that was added [1] to `bn_mul_mont` really
necessary? I noticed that when BoringSSL i