Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20161022.012155.944333974616925164.levi...@openssl.org> on Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:21:55 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte said: levitte> In message <21c4f180c97a4da6b716f852ac4d4...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:14:43 +, "Salz, Rich" said: levitte> levi

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <21c4f180c97a4da6b716f852ac4d4...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:14:43 +, "Salz, Rich" said: rsalz> Is electric fence even available any more? Just kill it. I just looked around, and it looks like you're right. Awright, I'll do the kill. Cheers, R

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Richard Levitte
Actually, -lefence comes from much further back in time. If you look at the configuration strings in Configure in version 1.0.2, you'll find debug-linux-elf, with that dreaded -lefence. Back in that version, ./config treats -d by prefixing the desired target with 'debug-', so 'debug-linux-elf' is

Re: [openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Salz, Rich
Is electric fence even available any more? Just kill it. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl-dev] Why is libefence needed for 32-bit debug (linux-elf) builds?

2016-10-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
During some testing today, I ended up trying to do a build of 1.1.0b configured for linux-elf --debug (with no-asm to work around some issue that was not my primary concern at the time), which failed due to a missing -lefence. The corresponding linux-x86_64 build on the same machine succeeds. It