So the bug report can be removed, right?
Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug.
(and *please* keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] among the recipients. It's quite
hard to follow history in the database when people keep skipping that
address)
Apologies.
nagendra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 29 17:43:06 2005]:
So the bug report can be removed, right?
Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug.
Thanks.
Ticket resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:30:40 -0700, nagendra
modadugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nagendra It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the
nagendra HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document
nagendra will be corrected.
So the bug report can be
It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the
HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document
will be corrected.
nagendra
* nagendra modadugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-08 17:09:40 -0700]:
I think you might have found a bug in the draft document. I'll get back
to you
I'm leaving this unresolved for now, since we still don't know if that's
a bug in the draft or not...
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
Hello,
I apologize if this message appears multiple times.
This is a proposed patch for openssl-0.9.8-beta for all platforms.
I tested it with openssl-0.9.8beta2 however I think it is applicable to
all openssl-0.9.8 trees.
I think the current implementation of DTLS is not compliant with
I think you might have found a bug in the draft document. I'll get back
to you soon. Thanks,
nagendra
* Tigran Gevorgyan via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-08 22:00:58 +0200]:
Hello,
I apologize if this message appears multiple times.
This is a proposed patch for openssl-0.9.8-beta
