[openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-08 Thread Tigran Gevorgyan via RT
Hello, I apologize if this message appears multiple times. This is a proposed patch for openssl-0.9.8-beta for all platforms. I tested it with openssl-0.9.8beta2 however I think it is applicable to all openssl-0.9.8 trees. I think the current implementation of DTLS is not compliant with

[openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-17 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
I'm leaving this unresolved for now, since we still don't know if that's a bug in the draft or not... -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Ma

[openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-29 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 29 17:43:06 2005]: > > So the bug report can be removed, right? > > Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug. Thanks. Ticket resolved. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Proje

Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-08 Thread nagendra modadugu
I think you might have found a bug in the draft document. I'll get back to you soon. Thanks, nagendra * Tigran Gevorgyan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-08 22:00:58 +0200]: > > > Hello, > I apologize if this message appears multiple times. > > This is a proposed patch for openssl-0.9

Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-25 Thread nagendra modadugu
It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document will be corrected. nagendra * nagendra modadugu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-08 17:09:40 -0700]: > > I think you might have found a bug in the draft document. I'll get back > to

Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 02:30:40 -0700, nagendra modadugu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nagendra> It turns out that the Version field was omitted from the nagendra> HelloVerify message in the internet draft. The document nagendra> will be corrected. So the bug report ca

Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-29 Thread nagendra modadugu
> So the bug report can be removed, right? Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug. > (and *please* keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] among the recipients. It's quite > hard to follow history in the database when people keep skipping that > address) Apologies. nagendra __

Re: [openssl.org #1105] DTLS HelloVerifyRequest PATCH

2005-06-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
> So the bug report can be removed, right? Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug. > (and *please* keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] among the recipients. It's quite > hard to follow history in the database when people keep skipping that > address) Apologies. nagendra